From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/damon/ops-common: prevent migration fallback to non-target nodes
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:07:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721140716.C39B01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721135607.251869-1-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] alloc_migration_target() overrides non-blocking gfp flags for large folios, causing kdamond to stall in synchronous direct reclaim.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3] mm/damon/ops-common: prevent migration fallback to non-target nodes ---
commit 18e8e5ad17abc759ddf7302875cde768864ba912
Author: Jiahui Zhang <jiahuitry@outlook.com>
mm/damon/ops-common: prevent migration fallback to non-target nodes
This commit modifies DAMON's migration target allocation to use __GFP_THISNODE.
This prevents the allocator from silently falling back to other nodes when the
target node is full, which previously caused misleading migration statistics.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.c b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> index d7d7f100389b0..e59f77eca83b2 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static unsigned int __damon_migrate_folio_list(
> * instead of migrated.
> */
> .gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) |
> - __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
> + __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_THISNODE,
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does adding __GFP_THISNODE here cause kdamond
to unexpectedly stall in synchronous direct reclaim when migrating large folios?
When migrate_pages() is called, it uses alloc_migration_target() in
mm/migrate.c. For large folios, alloc_migration_target() unconditionally
overrides the non-blocking GFP flags requested by DAMON:
mm/migrate.c:alloc_migration_target() {
...
if (folio_test_large(src)) {
/*
* clear __GFP_RECLAIM to make the migration callback
* consistent with regular THP allocations.
*/
gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_RECLAIM;
gfp_mask |= GFP_TRANSHUGE;
order = folio_order(src);
}
...
}
Because GFP_TRANSHUGE includes __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, the allocation can block.
Previously, without __GFP_THISNODE, the allocator could fall back to another
node. By enforcing __GFP_THISNODE on a full target node, this forced direct
reclaim will trigger, stalling the kdamond thread and preventing kswapd wakeups.
Could alloc_migration_target() be updated to respect the caller's intent to
not block?
> .nid = target_nid,
> };
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721135607.251869-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 13:56 [PATCH v3] mm/damon/ops-common: prevent migration fallback to non-target nodes SJ Park
2026-07-21 14:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-21 14:18 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721140716.C39B01F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox