From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 19:04:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802190431.080611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802185430.9940-2-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the patch fixes an indefinite hang in `mm/damon/reclaim.c` when writing to `commit_inputs` before the DAMON context starts, while failing to apply the identical fix to `mm/damon/lru_sort.c`. This leaves `damon_lru_sort` vulnerable to the exact same bug.
--
--- Patch [1]: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started ---
commit 86e90c966d8636445486cfde6487a797b433cb75
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started
This commit addresses an indefinite hang in DAMON reclaim when writing to
commit_inputs before the context has fully started. It introduces a tracking
flag to determine whether the DAMON context has successfully started in order
to safely skip damon_call().
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 7.2.x
> diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> index 09e941d75f67d..45d5557cc575a 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -291,11 +293,8 @@ static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> if (!commit_inputs_request)
> return 0;
>
> - /*
> - * Skip damon_call() if ctx is not initialized to avoid
> - * NULL pointer dereference.
> - */
> - if (!ctx)
> + /* Skip damon_call() if ctx has not successfully started. */
> + if (!damon_reclaim_damon_has_started)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the same vulnerability
exist in mm/damon/lru_sort.c?
It looks like damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store() uses the exact same
logic that was fixed here in reclaim.c:
mm/damon/lru_sort.c:damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store() {
...
/*
* Skip damon_call() if ctx is not initialized to avoid
* NULL pointer dereference.
*/
if (!ctx)
return -EINVAL;
err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
...
}
If a user writes to commit_inputs for damon_lru_sort before the thread has
started, could damon_call() blindly invoke wait_for_completion() and hang
indefinitely without a running thread to signal it?
Should a similar fix be applied to mm/damon/lru_sort.c to prevent a task
from hanging in an uninterruptible sleep state?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802185430.9940-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 18:54 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/{reclaim,lru_sort}: fix commit_inputs infinite hang SJ Park
2026-08-02 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started SJ Park
2026-08-02 19:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-02 19:07 ` SJ Park
2026-08-02 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: " SJ Park
2026-08-02 19:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:16 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802190431.080611F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox