From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:06:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803140642.0DCE51F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803134646.16640-2-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] The patch fixes an indefinite hang in `mm/damon/reclaim.c` when `commit_inputs` is written before the context is started, but completely misses the identical vulnerability in `mm/damon/lru_sort.c`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started ---
commit d00b612017f41a8bee83736cc54b16dba8d079ff
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started
DAMON_RECLAIM calls damon_call() for commit_inputs parameter user input
if the DAMON context is initialized. The context could be initialized,
but not yet successfully started. In the case, damon_call() could
indefinitely hang. Fix the problem by memorizing if the DAMON context
has ever successfully started, and skip damon_call() if it has not.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> index 09e941d75f67d..45d5557cc575a 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -291,11 +293,8 @@ static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> if (!commit_inputs_request)
> return 0;
>
> - /*
> - * Skip damon_call() if ctx is not initialized to avoid
> - * NULL pointer dereference.
> - */
> - if (!ctx)
> + /* Skip damon_call() if ctx has not successfully started. */
> + if (!damon_reclaim_damon_has_started)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue and was not introduced by the patch under review,
but does mm/damon/lru_sort.c also need this same fix?
Looking at damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store() in mm/damon/lru_sort.c, it
retains the identical vulnerable logic that was patched here in reclaim.c:
mm/damon/lru_sort.c:damon_lru_sort_commit_inputs_store() {
...
/*
* Skip damon_call() if ctx is not initialized to avoid
* NULL pointer dereference.
*/
if (!ctx)
return -EINVAL;
err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
...
}
If a user writes 'Y' to /sys/module/damon_lru_sort/parameters/commit_inputs
before the damon_lru_sort module has been turned on for the first time,
damon_call() is invoked before the kdamond thread has been created.
Will this cause the caller to hang indefinitely in wait_for_completion()
just like the reclaim.c version did?
Should a similar damon_lru_sort_damon_has_started flag be tracked in
damon_lru_sort_turn() to fix this in lru_sort.c as well?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803134646.16640-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 13:46 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon/{reclaim,lru_sort}: fix commit_inputs infinite hang SJ Park
2026-08-03 13:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/reclaim: skip damon_call() if ctx has not started SJ Park
2026-08-03 14:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 14:19 ` SJ Park
2026-08-03 13:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: " SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803140642.0DCE51F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).