From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:01:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813040141.2A72A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813035001.97364-4-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent invocation of `damon_call()` during kthread startup leads to an infinite kernel loop.
--
--- Patch [3]: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation ---
commit 07f6c5438f6069b0b8225e26e3726d6aa4e3da09
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation
DAMON_RECLAIM avoids passing NULL or unstarted damon_ctx to damon_call()
with its own validation. The validation is no longer needed, because
the DAMON core layer now handles the corner cases itself. Remove the
unnecessary check.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> index 45d5557cc575a..42a2c9cb13431 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -293,10 +291,6 @@ static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> if (!commit_inputs_request)
> return 0;
>
> - /* Skip damon_call() if ctx has not successfully started. */
> - if (!damon_reclaim_damon_has_started)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does removing this validation expose an
infinite loop in the DAMON core?
If userspace writes to this sysfs file concurrently with damon_start(),
damon_call() in mm/damon/core.c can hit a race condition. The core
initializes ctx->call_controls_obsolete to true. If damon_call() runs
before the kthread fully starts, it can read call_controls_obsolete == true
and jump to the canceled label:
mm/damon/core.c:damon_call() {
...
if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) {
mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
goto canceled;
}
...
canceled:
while (damon_is_running(ctx))
schedule_timeout_idle(msecs_to_jiffies(100));
return -ECANCELED;
}
If damon_start() concurrently sets ctx->kdamond to non-NULL,
damon_is_running(ctx) becomes true. Because the kthread has just started,
it runs indefinitely, and damon_call() gets trapped in the while loop
forever.
> err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
>
> return err ? err : control.return_code;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813035001.97364-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 3:49 [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/damon: allow NULL or unstarted damon_ctx parameter for damon_call() SJ Park
2026-08-13 3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/damon/core: handle NULL ctx parameter in damon_call() SJ Park
2026-08-13 3:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 8:33 ` Gutierrez Asier
2026-08-13 13:55 ` SJ Park
2026-08-13 14:27 ` Gutierrez Asier
2026-08-13 15:12 ` SJ Park
2026-08-13 3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/damon/core: set ctx->call_controls_obsolete in damon_new_ctx() SJ Park
2026-08-13 4:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 4:10 ` SJ Park
2026-08-13 3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation SJ Park
2026-08-13 4:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 4:11 ` SJ Park
2026-08-13 3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm/damon/lru_sort: " SJ Park
2026-08-13 4:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 4:12 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813040141.2A72A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox