From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jason Angelov" <jasonangelov@ucla.edu>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core-kunit: test probe_hits handling at region split and merge
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 03:57:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818035742.F0E5A1F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818034552.11975-2-jasonangelov@ucla.edu>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but there is an integer overflow in damon_merge_two_regions() when calculating size-weighted averages on 32-bit architectures.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core-kunit: test probe_hits handling at region split and merge ---
commit f275f8ec2d833d0e2eacc7a18ba7c56b04b7e599
Author: Jason Angelov <jasonangelov@ucla.edu>
mm/damon/core-kunit: test probe_hits handling at region split and merge
Extend damon_test_split_at() and damon_test_merge_two() tests to cover
handling of probe_hits and last_probe_hits arrays.
> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index 4a536d41cdb2d..2db94d49c9bae 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -204,6 +210,7 @@ static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 300ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 16u);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->probe_hits[0], 11);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the size-weighted average logic
tested here overflow on 32-bit architectures?
Looking at mm/damon/core.c:damon_merge_two_regions(), the calculations
multiply values like nr_accesses and probe_hits by the region size in bytes:
mm/damon/core.c:damon_merge_two_regions() {
...
l->nr_accesses = (l->nr_accesses * sz_l + r->nr_accesses * sz_r) /
(sz_l + sz_r);
...
for (i = 0; i < DAMON_MAX_PROBES; i++)
l->probe_hits[i] = (l->probe_hits[i] * sz_l + r->probe_hits[i]
* sz_r) / (sz_l + sz_r);
...
}
On a 32-bit architecture, unsigned long is 32 bits (max ~4.29GB). If a
region is just 17MB and probe_hits is 255, the multiplication
255 * 17,000,000 evaluates to ~4.33GB, which would silently truncate.
Could this wrap-around cause merged regions to inherit drastically incorrect
statistics, potentially misidentifying hot memory as cold and triggering
aggressive paging out of actively used pages?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818034552.11975-1-jasonangelov@ucla.edu?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 3:45 [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon: add kunit tests for probe_hits handling and probe params validation Jason Angelov
2026-08-18 3:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon/core-kunit: test probe_hits handling at region split and merge Jason Angelov
2026-08-18 3:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-18 4:46 ` SJ Park
2026-08-18 4:50 ` SJ Park
2026-08-18 3:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon/core-kunit: test damon_valid_probe_params() Jason Angelov
2026-08-18 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 4:55 ` SJ Park
2026-08-18 4:58 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm/damon: add kunit tests for probe_hits handling and probe params validation SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818035742.F0E5A1F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasonangelov@ucla.edu \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox