From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] mm/damon/sysfs: pass preps to DAMON core
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 22:24:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901052446.4122-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901045314.9C8631F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Tue, 01 Sep 2026 04:53:14 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] Data race on `sys_prep->action` due to lockless read and write
> --
>
> commit 09b46cd761363fb28603bd1d27adb637a6c16a7d
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/sysfs: pass preps to DAMON core
>
> DAMON sysfs interface provides the files for setting DAMON probe preps.
> But the underlying code is not really passing the user-set values to
> DAMON core. Pass those.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> > index c0130843223d7..d02f5f8ceae5b 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
> > @@ -2176,6 +2176,23 @@ static int damon_sysfs_set_attrs(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
> > return damon_set_attrs(ctx, &attrs);
> > }
> >
> > +static int damon_sysfs_set_preps(struct damon_probe *probe,
> > + struct damon_sysfs_preps *sys_preps)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < sys_preps->nr; i++) {
> > + struct damon_sysfs_prep *sys_prep = sys_preps->preps_arr[i];
> > + struct damon_prep *prep;
> > +
> > + prep = damon_new_prep(sys_prep->action);
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Could this result in a data race on sys_prep->action?
>
> During DAMON context building, this locklessly reads the action enum while a
> concurrent root user could be writing to the /sys/.../prep_action attribute.
>
> A concurrent write to prep_action could happen while another process issues a
> commit command to the state file, which runs damon_sysfs_commit_input
> asynchronously on the kdamond thread without holding damon_sysfs_lock.
>
> Would it be better to use READ_ONCE() here, along with a corresponding
> WRITE_ONCE() on the writer side, to adhere to the Linux Kernel Memory Model
> guidelines and avoid potential KCSAN warnings?
Good catch. A few similar call paths protect stores with damon_sysfs_lock. I
will protect prep->action writing with the lock. Because the context build is
done while holding the lock, it should avoid the race, like below.
'''
--- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c
+++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c
@@ -827,7 +827,10 @@ static ssize_t prep_action_store(struct kobject *kobj,
action_name = &damon_sysfs_prep_action_names[i];
if (sysfs_streq(buf, action_name->name)) {
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&damon_sysfs_lock))
+ return -EBUSY;
prep->action = action_name->action;
+ mutex_unlock(&damon_sysfs_lock);
ret = count;
break;
}
'''
>
> > + if (!prep)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + damon_add_prep(probe, prep);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> [ ... ]
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260901043417.2165-1-sj@kernel.org?part=13
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 4:33 [PATCH 00/17] mm/damon: introduce data access-as-a-data attribute SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:33 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm/damon/core: introduce DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_PGIDLE_UNSET SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:33 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm/damon/paddr: support PGIDLE_UNSET probe filter type SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:33 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm/damon/sysfs: support pgidle_unset " SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 04/17] Docs/mm/damon/design: document " SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_prep struct SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:01 ` SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm/damon/core: commit preps SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_operations->prep_probes() SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 08/17] mm/damon/paddr: support damon_prep SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:05 ` SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 09/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement preps directory SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 10/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement preps/nr_preps file SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 11/17] mm/damon/sysfs: create directories for nr_preps writes SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement prep_action file SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm/damon/sysfs: pass preps to DAMON core SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:24 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 14/17] selftests/damon/sysfs.sh: test probe prep sysfs files SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 15/17] Docs/mm/damon/design: document probe preps SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 16/17] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: document probe preps sysfs files SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 4:34 ` [PATCH 17/17] Docs/ABI/damon: document probe prep " SJ Park
2026-09-01 4:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 5:26 ` [PATCH 00/17] mm/damon: introduce data access-as-a-data attribute SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901052446.4122-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox