From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA7E30F92D for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 05:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788328496; cv=none; b=GB7ARpPisgmMekcGTTlYf3OYaB2MKKpnXdLxEXO5Y7Pl9fmN+MzDueR9d8yU+SrxCFTGo/0w35PhHY+e2KfhXs5S8Q2wPdlrzz4uRS2N4q0Znq3aIiU6eo+g3vJg8bnygR6l3myqG6mKbJFKNcrPLe80iVl2U3PHcbG5V6qeI8k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788328496; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TXURMYnNq67POJWKdTDJVLDkBea+pWrf1FGhgfq0Szk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=X8vlRoQjKKubChh9pX8x23COsSw2/gnuSJVGRUppdxetswM2GyHLIzk9EDtOuX5NIq2W8r4By0ASnxQGMjK7wmUg8XRKvFp+dISCv+a5uT9QTcMi1b+zcwMOj6nMYFKGAVXkzv7GzPMvdoEbS7qM03NginkUvrsDzmClgqUob2I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=apvWyoPr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="apvWyoPr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9A801F00A3A; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 05:54:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788328495; bh=u3xgEtJNxWU0wMdhlCvR3IU+I6tiH4AAIXcXaSXXKSU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=apvWyoPrRMP7YGmV/Anm0uHPRkUUwTVFSYgKdj1KYST1iF+zBeq98w98hQorqMVqA MUlRLYYTnkdjnx06NOUJfBHxDwdvL905y0fJR9drQrJgVF1r+1xxMijrlvh2LsIhjA 3/EHpgZXgJE5m4IvPcNA+Fbwm4oeaD4CJ0YsCbmGhIWwmMSFsYDwRetXfjg4fWkH9X H5Pg2Xo3qIDxl+BF+gXWZGEs34q7OCk+k1TBEcJp+zFuqiHMlOGR664WVf8AY11HBF HQXvvfQlp6GXRCgDBysQd8BRDmq5xC4SxCQYUtUW4L//Ru9qXxSdKYn9iH2t3uZw+s /7mp6wXJcdnew== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] Docs/mm/damon/maintainer-profile: update AI review for Sashiko replies Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "SJ Park" Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20260902054747.99370-12-sj@kernel.org> References: <20260902054747.99370-1-sj@kernel.org> <20260902054747.99370-12-sj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 05:54:54 +0000 Message-Id: <20260902055454.C9A801F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > In the past, sharing Sashiko review results was tedious. Also it was > suggested to minimize the recipients on the sharing mails. Hence the AI > review section of DAMON maintainer profile document was updated to give > guidance about available tools for making the sharing easier, and how > the recipients list should be managed. >=20 > Now DAMON is onboarded [1] to Sashiko's automatic review replies > feature. Sashiko directly sends its reviews as replies to the patch > mail thread. It also reduces the recipients list to deliver the > reporting to only the author and the mailing list. >=20 > Remove the old guidance that is no more necessary but only confusing. >=20 > [1] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/commit/b554c7b6e733 >=20 > Signed-off-by: SJ Park Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902054747.9937= 0-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3D11