From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD2F3A9612; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 11:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788346993; cv=none; b=Tj059sH+pdKSHcmBpcqMP9sDD14aZDojQaCdckYPGko/Nv/XsZh+Q5VQuje7EmNeU9Hat6H8r6bXWrQqpw57k+E9F8mjizFru71L8stJtHT69KRNB9Eiyc/OUMpnEJ0/h5ZEgnaRS28YIT5ttwz2k7s9ZAjkHKS0LkDozNWv6UI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788346993; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1hwkSGbuj2IaG08oRyEnwalYZYTJwh47DjvQXN2CSaM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=EFkAWpabrgi7HEwWwwm+d2gxeRFxUrZHR+RMW+f5D7q/ubmKlGupXYSa65BW+ncFPil45kjWv9Rnk7JyDjwB3ua4JfRGEZiPKzVrvQpRn15nuCH99zrflDee9nj6/9ExRIW577eCEXiyP3UsZjkem122BU/bdwVVQkSwRBZCQcg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VRB6qxFL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VRB6qxFL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71B2F1F000E9; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788346991; bh=1hwkSGbuj2IaG08oRyEnwalYZYTJwh47DjvQXN2CSaM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=VRB6qxFLlQI9ZT+2j6nIFZC2pBfW+Cdxt3dzPfT9KvUCbDW2/ecrA1KIEoYrrDZuG Ry+2agGkNCxXE+X55xBFLcdMP0y+Owvnz36SWbMt7sRxxIt6a8pyZ0cNH2+5IxHwzr wBc5VN5hci3aTGSHkGujVulXNaxRi6lvhygI/cC+bbnFaxFHeRQIo38lQraqTtfyfP f3OigdofXEmq8yIjmWAAvC69qITL/miMM4XnJCezVGHt/hGwgqG0k21eUhV9YQyO2c NXfRoCRoZ5KrI/0dViZm5HDf6Y87Mk4ARQZocOF2bvbuIivizWpSADglqy0uuj6ncf kxF9VU+bqO6yA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/11] mm/migrate: add migrate_lru_folios() entry point Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Shivank Garg" Cc: "Anna Schumaker" , damon@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, "Jeff Layton" , "Chuck Lever" , dsterba@suse.cz In-Reply-To: <20260902-migrate-refactor-shivank-v1-7-9dcca87669c4@amd.com> References: <20260902-migrate-refactor-shivank-v1-0-9dcca87669c4@amd.com> <20260902-migrate-refactor-shivank-v1-7-9dcca87669c4@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 11:03:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20260902110311.71B2F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > migrate_pages() currently handles the asynchronous and synchronous LRU > paths separately and retries split folios itself. >=20 > Move this logic into migrate_lru_folios(), leaving migrate_pages() to > dispatch hugetlb, movable_ops, and LRU folios through their respective > entry points. >=20 > Keep the existing retry and accounting behavior unchanged. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902-migrate-re= factor-shivank-v1-0-9dcca87669c4@amd.com?part=3D7