DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:02:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909040249.243941F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909035813.162131-1-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The error-checking condition `!damon_nr_regions(t) != 2` is always true due to operator precedence, causing the test to unconditionally skip its core assertions.
--

commit 6fefc501724f8572d4bbc1782d2ab55fa7568e21
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()

This patch updates damon_test_split_at() to verify the region count was
successfully changed before proceeding. This prevents invalid pointer
dereferences if the split fails.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260718001442.87129-3-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714142352.100478-1-sj@kernel.org [1]

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
> index d8fef225930a5..1dd17d43a642c 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test)
>  	}
>  	damon_add_region(r, t);
>  	damon_split_region_at(t, r, 25);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
> +	if (!damon_nr_regions(t) != 2)
> +		goto out;

[Severity: Medium]
Will this error-checking condition unintentionally skip the core assertions
of the test?

Because of operator precedence, !damon_nr_regions(t) evaluates to either 0
or 1. Neither 0 nor 1 equals 2, meaning the inequality (!= 2) is always true.

This seems to force the test to unconditionally take the goto out path, 
bypassing the boundary validations it is designed to perform.

>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 25ul);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909035813.162131-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2026090820-envoy-endanger-c99b@gregkh>
2026-09-09  3:58 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-09-09  4:02   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09  6:32     ` SJ Park
2026-09-09  6:34   ` SJ Park
2026-09-09  6:36 ` SJ Park
2026-09-09  6:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 20:26   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909040249.243941F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox