From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792875962; b=vtMyGCpJcclxlZpcP64KZoyWwF3cCARL0Dus6ng7gs0QEhFt44/qdMbQGJS3OP9ufIWL mKfpO5MpFgnRYfW2VcbEBBbn0gfC2MjXCFcVuQXOXzaSNcimfenwiSgM1FauBO06D+YPm 5oTI+OMnBIc3zDYcasf3oxycbQwV6Q8rwNoJ2M5fHF0lbh8Y+d+v3jvpoXPPkSEFY68TY lReIW9EMCgdzBXIt1Vy864GVx1e1RGjlXbsCUuGPxcwqOYq25nQ6AX+b7kkC2+aazygCx EPgrs7TT1U6pV/tEtRZJD+GGCq4rx+d8xzl0cDKKvc12CSMh8BLyOw14YW8XwT0uMew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792875962; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=DEsKqDozT8n8jNTNyGDSZhCKcPX9RBFL/scJ3pbGQhs=; b=FBlPE02PsvxguOP5Y9GfDbnEcjlvGFJxqqa+E1TAdz6fH5yQRTM3Vft+8HXjSK93bs3v B9eKb7Yzv9nxRe29U+yaQTB158R2neyiy8BlRVvtYEIGoU2sq/K3+rbFPGRDhsTRaiVyb WQBHVuXqcRgk0wf2WIFxnGXuWJD44jgbnnKiFJcPcYUX7R3F4B3hFwQnXOWR4cWYMtugl yXNfI1epDzAVmW5twIIitL32IWmX4+cIKwn36a2ylvTosvxauCOaxY3Aemnmav5ejrFxE B7nOF4D0F+vcE2ynZifVCI6ywaun79HgQBR6Y/q243FFkesG/ZIPpZB+oI65W/koonA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=ezNgzsb8; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCEB7606A31A for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 21:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=ezNgzsb8 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 387621F01825; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 21:06:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792875961; bh=DEsKqDozT8n8jNTNyGDSZhCKcPX9RBFL/scJ3pbGQhs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ezNgzsb85kahEwcwhrlzwf36YMCMkDLQZRknAlrRVmPpefT08RBhYoq+eB7DeCkZw V1wdd0+bOhX3JCa2Wt5676K40aDQ+Stkvx8K7oKHHh9GkNL6Kf9Z8tKhxeu4Z31o2c Qz/WwwwHtpF8h7F4Iq+LxSzlGyl76BRFtaJZW+Kw7BU31QD2FQCD4XRGKsNX5DquUG 062Kud6LwX+ltIYp+H4IaWL4qmyHdmLiWySvk5JkI8LV2x8PK2YB/1ToQYe/kHU9GX fr7pMCoH0kRc5FOT3oqelD/9Sd3E5jm2GLYqp2gPWqXY+PbQOFzsVmTL9PY3WwNfOw Zm1+7ZMcmCpyQ== From: SJ Park To: SJ Park Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev Subject: Ways to handle Sashiko bug reports for DAMON (was "Re: [False Bug] mm/damon/core: uninitialized boolean fields in damon_new_scheme()") Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:05:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20261024210554.88440-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261024195239.87431-1-sj@kernel.org> References: X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, 24 Oct 2026 12:52:39 -0700 SJ Park wrote: > Hello, > > > Sashiko reported a bug that I believe a false positive. Sharing the report and > why I think it is false in usual mail format, to get help from more eyeballs. I was about to keep doing this for all false positive reports. I added a comment on the Sashiko web ui for this report, closed it, and opened another report that I think a false positive. And I realized this is tedious and not sustainable. Actually nowadays I was taking time to think about more options. Those include but not limited to making more tooling and just sharing everything on the mailing list and forget about the database. I still find no best option. And I feel like I might spending too much time on this. Maybe I'm thinking too much. I will just do whatever I feel better to do at the moment. So I might share some Sashiko reports on mailing list or not. Maybe I will start from just not sharing Sashiko reports on mailing list except mentioning those on relevant patch descriptions including Closes: tag. Please don't expect any consistency in my way of Sashiko reports handling for now. Thanks, SJ