From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794076622; b=O2qaS19rn0Z1o6O209v7nARvibzeCYNj44/RR6R9YQ5K0rZ0KmRNOZfUSWA4fTuTi7ph 81BhVMzB4bTdj/tOaXZQG7hWDSYRc8ED570XnfVp1aoJUQI+ywCxbqQoZVhpOYyi5yWj2 VRbKbxI0tsF+ssjObnit9/2vXRFiuN3WbO6wGO736Y5G99OJCYNMY80NsxwLjPGJSjLHb DgYvehSFOfm61Jhmc8zFmI1cUV1YQVrUq/PlX2MpsS2+FMwy2LxKa55eTZ+sMPk2/Js6N 7bUptj4/qQ6z6RIUBmn4HyeRzNtiReUfAY/IVvcYToIyfIW6f4u3SCdUW6XEF6muw0w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794076622; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=ERuNgL3/8ubnIoEFYnufjQbxnvviKD87N6fwTkLdxrI=; b=ZGfjSXV3PkwzepjC5zdlIpcGQ5tTdkNLwpH3NcNwCST/hTOjq5NwD/k9NpJ5C0WdDnhY DiGxhr5Puy+u33Mliq4Ds039k8BpmoEIkxeOT+sAouT6oVj2f3SfWxrD0bJW3pybqEgg5 Ykm8So2O3tt44Sig6w97+EnzU3s5ampk+e+tMYGtv6VQIPy9MzDdX+N1KVkvVgNXT3Kyh PVR2K9tMypT4ZEWzrP9/9rE744gponOQ0aYAoMp1rTyXTBeduM82cEYDF8xz64ZPum5CD Z1K0dpNl1Ck+ZhcXkIHc5dGe9QGjj5zLZrr+zvZSMmcPmpoj2fIlaZTGE7LkDWE+ABw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="axbka1s/"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8580E606A326; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 18:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=axbka1s/ Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB8051F0089F; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 18:37:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794076622; bh=ERuNgL3/8ubnIoEFYnufjQbxnvviKD87N6fwTkLdxrI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=axbka1s/19gUwcu/QXKm+mhOqmjccYmIKBleffEGvgIx8Cwl/MDFXNzPFTUVZieCc QPht6WBEQo89ZR+KB1uvAOrUy4wpU9ZL/J/YUoGM0CpkO545NDcnzsHUoZEXuYWyPM lRA2TMFaIDCehp3d4o7YmLulYSrMWIGShMbD3eAeF/sCOOqMfxOWfnl9X54h8ct80V ZangmDWEA8OsKkud4r7T3UJyHHW6BvIr0eu/36eGXF2j7tXV7sKFE1QUtN3G9nFuzm 0cXQqgCAw91wiJZcx+Tt94dz5/lB+il+DS/VFZVkRegyYXH/gyms4YXRlQtYkSrAkI uL1ahsyYUkJ3g== From: SJ Park To: SJ Park Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Andrew Morton , Brendan Higgins , David Gow , Usama Arif , Sasha Levin , damon@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.3 0655/1257] mm/damon/core-kunit: test invalid damos filter commits Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 10:36:49 -0800 Message-ID: <20261107183650.177635-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261107183202.177477-1-sj@kernel.org> References: X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, 07 Nov 2026 10:32:10 -0800 SJ Park wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2026 08:49:11 -0500 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 7.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > TL;DR: Please drop this. It has wrong Cc: stable@ tag. > > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: SJ Park > > > > [ Upstream commit 409d2ab6d98209c30d45123920721710475a30b4 ] > > > > Add test cases for testing the validation of damos filter arguments in > > commit time. > > This patch is for testing commit 1bfb9384ae0e ("mm/damon/core: disallow max < > min damos filter range arguments commit"), which does not exist in 7.3.y. > Hence this patch is making DAMON kunit fails. > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260914142327.92510-9-sj@kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: SJ Park > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > > Cc: Brendan Higgins > > Cc: David Gow > > Cc: Usama Arif > > Cc: > > I didn't intend this to be applied to stable@. My original patch [1] hence > doesn't have Cc: stable@. But I show Cc: stable@ tag in the upstream commit. > Seems Andrew added Cc: stable@ while applying it to mm.git and I missed it. > Sorry for not catching this early. > > So, this patch is not really meant to be picked into stable@, and only causing > the kunit failure. Could you please drop this? FWIW, the patch was posted as a part of a series that have a few Cc: stable@ patches. I did so because Cc: stable@ patches are only for minor bug fixes that does not require the fast path of hotfixes. Apparently it only confused Andrew or his script. Sorry about that. I will not mix Cc: stable@ patches with non-Cc: stable@ patches from the next time. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260914142327.92510-9-sj@kernel.org > > > Thanks, > SJ > > [...] > Thanks, SJ