From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/27] mm/damon/paddr: support REPORT_MADE type probe filter
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 13:40:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115214048.103814-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-215850@kernel.org>
On Sun, 15 Nov 2026 20:41:34 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
> issues to consider:
> - [High] mm/damon: out-of-bounds and uninitialized read in
> damon_report_exist()
> - [Medium] mm/damon: phys_addr_t truncation and unit mismatch in
> damon_pa_filter_match()
> - [Medium] mm/damon: uninitialized filter->report_type in
> damon_pa_filter_match()
> --
>
> commit db7c0b8660ac4e99fdce33921b7535218eaa4dc6
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/paddr: support REPORT_MADE type probe filter
>
> This commit adds support for the DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_REPORT_MADE probe
> filter in the physical address space operation set by querying
> damon_report_exist() over the last sampling interval.
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > index 5b773012a8764..04e95047f8cea 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> > @@ -140,9 +140,10 @@ static void damon_pa_prep_probes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, bool set_samples)
> > }
> >
> > static bool damon_pa_filter_match(struct damon_filter *filter,
> > - struct folio *folio)
> > + struct folio *folio, phys_addr_t pa, struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> > {
> > bool matched = false;
> > + struct damon_addr_range addr_range;
> >
> > switch (filter->type) {
> > case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_PGIDLE_UNSET:
> > @@ -157,19 +158,27 @@ static bool damon_pa_filter_match(struct damon_filter *filter,
> > else
> > matched = damon_folio_young(folio) == false;
> > break;
> > + case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_REPORT_MADE:
> > + addr_range.start = pa;
> > + addr_range.end = pa + 1;
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can assigning pa and pa + 1 into addr_range truncate 64-bit physical
> addresses and miss reports when ctx->addr_unit > 1?
>
> struct damon_addr_range defines start and end as unsigned long, so on
> 32-bit PAE/LPAE systems where phys_addr_t is 64-bit, physical addresses
> at or above 4 GiB lose their upper 32 bits (and pa + 1 wraps to 0 when
> the low 32 bits are 0xffffffff).
Missing a report for this edge case is fine. It only degrades DAMON's
monitoring results, which is anyway best effort.
> In addition, when ctx->addr_unit > 1,
> pa is aligned to ctx->addr_unit, so setting addr_range.end = pa + 1 only
> checks the first byte of the sampled unit instead of [pa, pa +
> ctx->addr_unit).
That's fine. Technically speaking, the sampling is only for the sampling byte.
>
> > + matched = damon_report_exist(filter->report_type, &addr_range,
> > + jiffies -
> > + usecs_to_jiffies(ctx->attrs.sample_interval));
> > + break;
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does calling damon_report_exist() read uninitialized or out-of-bounds
> elements from damon_report_queue.reports?
>
> In damon_submit_report(), the report is written at queue->reports[tail]
> and queue->tail is then incremented, so queue->tail points to the next
> slot to be written and is never wrapped when it reaches queue->size:
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damon_submit_report() {
> ...
> tail = queue->tail;
> if (tail == queue->size)
> tail = 0;
> queue->reports[tail] = *report;
> queue->tail++;
> ...
> }
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damon_report_exist() {
> ...
> idx = queue->tail;
> for (nr_read = 0; nr_read < queue->nr_reports; nr_read++) {
> report = &queue->reports[idx];
> if (idx)
> idx--;
> else
> idx = queue->size - 1;
> ...
> }
>
> Because damon_report_exist() indexes queue->reports[idx] at queue->tail
> before decrementing idx, it reads uninitialized heap memory on the first
> iteration while 1 <= nr_reports < queue->size (and never inspects index
> 0), and reads out of bounds at queue->reports[queue->size] and beyond once
> queue->size reports have been submitted.
Yes, I will fix it in the earlier patch.
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can filter->report_type be uninitialized here when a new
> DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_REPORT_MADE filter is added via damon_commit_ctx()?
>
> damon_new_filter() allocates struct damon_filter with kmalloc_obj()
> without zeroing the union, and when damon_commit_filters() creates a new
> filter it only copies union members for DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_MEMCG and
> DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE:
>
> mm/damon/core.c:damon_commit_filters() {
> ...
> new_filter = damon_new_filter(src_filter->type,
> src_filter->matching, src_filter->allow);
> if (!new_filter)
> return -ENOMEM;
> switch (src_filter->type) {
> case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_MEMCG:
> new_filter->memcg_id = src_filter->memcg_id;
> break;
> case DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_HUGEPAGE_SIZE:
> if (src_filter->range_max < src_filter->range_min) {
> damon_destroy_filter(new_filter);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> new_filter->range_min = src_filter->range_min;
> new_filter->range_max = src_filter->range_max;
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> As a result, new_filter->report_type retains uninitialized slab bytes
> when damon_pa_filter_match() passes it to damon_report_exist().
Yes, I will fix it in the earlier patch.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261115202849.99134-1-sj@kernel.org?part=14
>
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 20:28 [RFC PATCH 00/27] mm/damon: let users report their data attribute findings SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 01/27] mm/damon/api: introduce struct damon_report SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:09 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 02/27] mm/damon/core: implement data attribute report queue SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:17 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 03/27] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_submit_report() SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:23 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 04/27] mm/damon/sysfs: add admin/reports/ directory SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 05/27] mm/damon/sysfs: add reports/producers/ directory SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 06/27] mm/damon/sysfs: add producers/nr_producers file SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 07/27] mm/damon/sysfs: implement report producer directory SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 08/27] mm/damon/sysfs: implement report producer type and state files SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 09/27] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for report system SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 10/27] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for report producer sysfs SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 11/27] Docs/ABI/damon: update for report producer sysfs files SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 12/27] mm/damon/core: introduce DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_REPORT_MADE SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:27 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 13/27] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_report_exist() SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:35 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 14/27] mm/damon/paddr: support REPORT_MADE type probe filter SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:40 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 15/27] mm/damon/sysfs: add filter_report_type file under probe filter directory SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 16/27] mm/damon/sysfs: support REPORT_MADE type probe filter setup SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:42 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 17/27] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for report_made probe filter type SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 18/27] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for REPORT_MADE probe filter SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 19/27] Docs/ABI/damon: " SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 20/27] mm/damon/api: introduce user_report report type SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 21/27] mm/damon/sysfs: add user_report support for report type input SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 22/27] mm/damon/sysfs: implement report producer addr_{start,end} files SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 23/27] mm/damon/sysfs: implement submit command for report producer SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 21:43 ` SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 24/27] selftests/damon/sysfs.sh: add basic tests for admin/reports/ SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for user report support SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 26/27] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: update for user_report " SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 27/27] Docs/ABI/damon: " SJ Park
2026-11-15 20:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 00/27] mm/damon: let users report their data attribute findings SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261115214048.103814-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox