DAMON development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y v3 1/2] mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes()
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 06:41:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166283@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010063042.8611-2-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm/damon: double-application of earlier schemes to newly split regions
--

commit 01d768c4d318527360ef5913771d20f22a99984a
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes()

kdamond_apply_schemes() is using damon_for_each_region_safe(), which is
safe for deallocation of the region inside the loop. However, the loop
internal logic does not deallocate regions. Hence it is only wasting the
next pointer.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260227170623.95384-3-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 7afbc20833ea4..b5c85e6488596 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -912,7 +911,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
>  	}
>  
>  	damon_for_each_target(t, c) {
> -		damon_for_each_region_safe(r, next_r, t)
> +		damon_for_each_region(r, t)
>  			damon_do_apply_schemes(c, t, r);

[Severity: High]
Does this code cause earlier schemes to be applied twice to newly split
regions?

If multiple schemes are configured, an earlier scheme (e.g. Scheme 0) might
apply its action to a full, un-split region. If a later scheme (e.g.
Scheme 1) then decides to split the region, damon_split_region_at() inserts
the newly split part into the list immediately after the current region.

Because this loop in kdamond_apply_schemes() now uses
damon_for_each_region() instead of the safe variant, the outer loop will
advance to this newly split region and call damon_do_apply_schemes() on it
again.

Will this cause damon_do_apply_schemes() to evaluate the new region from
the beginning of the scheme list, resulting in Scheme 0 executing its
memory management actions (like madvise) and counting statistics a second
time on the same memory range?

>  	}
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261010063042.8611-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-10  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2026092949-surpass-thimble-02a8@gregkh>
2026-09-30  9:48 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-09-30 10:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 10:23     ` SJ Park
2026-10-02 14:19   ` Sasha Levin
2026-10-09 14:48 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix last region handling of damos_skip_charged_regions() SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:48   ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 1/2] mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes() SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:56     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 15:09       ` SJ Park
2026-10-09 14:48   ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-10-09 15:04     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 15:11       ` SJ Park
2026-10-10  6:30 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v3 0/2] mm/damon/core: fix last region handling of damos_skip_charged_regions() SJ Park
2026-10-10  6:30   ` [PATCH 6.1.y v3 1/2] mm/damon/core: do non-safe region walk on kdamond_apply_schemes() SJ Park
2026-10-10  6:41     ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-10  7:11       ` SJ Park
2026-10-10  6:30   ` [PATCH 6.1.y v3 2/2] mm/damon/core: fix unconditionally skip last region SJ Park
2026-10-10  6:46     ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10  7:12       ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166283@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox