From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793553645; b=rjxNMkZkivxK1vGRBUwWgMU2mGl30O7cw5+W4mciuUvg/10uUGMnBcV5/OSjrUX29qHn /g9Fv48XHqyAhynCbLQO+vjAqDwOp1MF9tJdOTfUuzSqQtXBbYkUSGHqr5oyXnyfgVwax XW+tW4yANNhwJpc2YW6Km8aovSb+o3bqcoUu4KBE3330ov9HAEi2hMlaTqP2Dpd0rSS0Q jQZMX7xNRSvS+NW/hP3sZtug0iRRj+aafeA0ZBsIEy16scnCFp2Bbdj+Ps/qX+FQn5kM4 YndyDUFEDgK+0te9M0q+rYW0kPxMJO6Ue333+W7lCj/hi+jcrghO9gSnVJhQufDDm6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793553645; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=Q5zNVXdZQeuxmOn9a/a6AhqjI1cyyUu/Pybufe0UgsU=; b=DuoEmzv/7iUsamDyhCB/pwjh+7PCos18/AN+Z/iETy/qLxTCpHBPbqv/WFbAOQYkpcG1 9AllBloUHm2jxXKep3GByMdp/IowVDzNFnL6rXLX7Q7fXsrZILO5V0HXIm24+X5MnTt6/ aeIf8s88/Bix4qy55zXwo08XDF8kIT0EzynTyNV/l9voqutaBgp7uZNHcg7jqDCaJPrIg muJIYnzMxSV4w3DF6qvm4XI5RUZL/9FVnkm+Lr014uMlRRAllOpt82aY0w+4rAwjNahg7 Z6NV6NIuJX4Ckynqj04eLYZ8tqH497Niz1gHyXSLMmDs5bU4ccrmyCT67X96jYnyV2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=OxGxrlCy; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B78B7606A324 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2026 17:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=OxGxrlCy Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D3241F000C1; Sun, 1 Nov 2026 17:20:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793553644; bh=Q5zNVXdZQeuxmOn9a/a6AhqjI1cyyUu/Pybufe0UgsU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=OxGxrlCyfz40T61O4UEZ9aqBstEnK1sV77j5h72HqmX6fmD7Ywe1IvFxflfC8WEMm U0Vvw5wxeZSVjWGf9yRvB9lCUu7bv1SEIz8AimIyA6ZomarF3T+HpNJUjljr/Mjqmp zxJHXtODXwPlUtyr7IWf3k1wgCHohtidfCiTexdQ3U46HHganHxDU+0XQ+osV6QGNk +2xGjnQXRb/zdjnst1Ez4kGMcngtuAgbT8Ec7S89OG3dhUGNCNVlLQC/ZF26Sq0rVB sc5pbceqJ4Rer4fiLaxcteySB0MgXJZ2Hy0hb0O5LW8I+UVihjVSlWfWL/wP1Yw5Km b2kwuOk5lxfPg== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] mm/damon/vaddr: advance migration attempt in folio level for filter out Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "SJ Park" Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20261101171630.81477-2-sj@kernel.org> References: <20261101171630.81477-1-sj@kernel.org> <20261101171630.81477-2-sj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2026 17:20:44 +0000 X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry() finds folios to migrate under the given > pmd, using a loop for the pmd address range. The loop advances in page > size if a given folio is excluded by DAMOS ops filters. DAMOS ops > filters work in folio granularity. Hence it is more efficient and makes > sense to advance in the folio size. >=20 > Advance the loop in folio size for the ops filter out decision. For > that, do the folio size based loop advancement offset update before > applying DAMOS ops filters. >=20 > Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-67c34df7-6dfb-4e18-9ce0-0d26915e5= 785 > Signed-off-by: SJ Park Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261101171630.8147= 7-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3D1