From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794165527; b=L+1qrbmQpztwTS4VZtl1H1Q8jZ8Sh/7beog+g0UmbgNhKl+QCPHqR/4I4NS1+VFDZkwQ TB6iANRyfeLgw3mwLAf1Szqw3H8QboW1q6IOephNl8+xkKxu+EG7YnSFB+cL7MnZta6AL 8y059/aFDx3SAVAg7Fc8sznWxn5PckC2pMHTJ9TvcHLVMHSQcXHTxbaqBNOoJCcb7kyZf lUNSYQ8Ow3y6WHNOD4/x68ei2syx5QNit7W6T6edIb4mh1PQ1zRlT7GECQCaXs4yaGAq5 fhfhPjSiHrQCxS6ExMeDPnqH2Qhc2M9SlAjjdLY7vvyXITYt5efDgv8EFjf2/E/fyFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794165527; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=pTp0FtP0KDykKtMCyqDUBSFPpcdMtfp9mq6Oal10slI=; b=At72+oI58QalzF0vMFU2vUGGo9q6Log4A8QozTVBw0GpfK8nPT7UN2SxF4I9U9O+Igg/ CZz3xsyOPM1Wjt4AcpDaZJ7roZBGJ7kgdK1eeDIBIYA/1KZ7zphWtt1X96xg4ciVSx69y SqXKsu2IyZQGPwOohoMCOzwJvGoUvuJjk9mqCfLj1FA3/ftJZi9y5Nijb6+ZKZqFqsLbJ EdRJllnGvxjqObfkeysOy4Wy7VZFghYCLr5axuDqWnj5F7oNazPrKyw8fzNE2+UhdJdIS jIrJ+SoixaYsngxTYFJza4N3MvCn12/3ZKTPr1hxeUlMCGVggrZwhcxI1JzFa46xf4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=U5sHN8Sv; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3870B606A320 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=U5sHN8Sv Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E30F81F0089F; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794165527; bh=pTp0FtP0KDykKtMCyqDUBSFPpcdMtfp9mq6Oal10slI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=U5sHN8SvpKeQLz2PUMFNmY604tMYEdyfcZ0aCGWCbxnr1z5CSvgIebmB5NbbaHVos 64QBw7daMsmdcV4WksHsisbrt/qbSbeCcWPLYrkvYJVee9sKjYUXzuvS/D/MoZKl9B GCY6O3esJpium+CXDR5NVzYPZani/9mmx+xZyaj/wbKIg/cujcyuepJ6guGntENwDj 0WbwYp5b35oTEOlBrkEcuVLLQq6wN5irOtil/WzjzWAAcKwuOpKXMzuiZnrmT8mcXL js/51mmQljXkfup1GfHsscN6T+1pjPU9UJnJXyQpok5JpgFdEg/JxOuwgr0gWd44b7 x/nLpHii5GBaA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/damon/api: define DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_ACTIVE Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "SJ Park" Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20261108191615.113362-2-sj@kernel.org> References: <20261108191615.113362-1-sj@kernel.org> <20261108191615.113362-2-sj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 19:18:46 +0000 X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > Knowing which memory is on Active LRU lists is useful for understanding > and optimally operating systems. Extend the DAMON core layer to be > ready for support of that. For that, define a new damon_filter_type, > DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_ACTIVE. It has no additional arguments and therefore > no additional change in the core layer is needed. Testing if a given > memory is on an LRU list for the type of filter should be implemented in > the operation set layer. >=20 > Signed-off-by: SJ Park Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261108191615.1133= 62-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3D1