From: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
To: dash@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wait regression in 3800d4
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 23:28:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100522212852.GA36029@stack.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519190856.19606.qmail@ea7dd6dfa89c0a.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:08:56PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi, since commit 3800d49 the wait builtin shows some unexpected
> behavior, see http://bugs.debian.org/581425
> To reproduce:
> $ dash -c '
> for i in 1 2 3; do
> (sleep $i; echo $i) &
> done
> wait
> echo all done
> sleep 2'
> 1
> all done
> 2
> 3
> $
> Expected output:
> 1
> 2
> 3
> all done
> I don't completely understand commitdiff 3800d49, and didn't find time
> to fix the lack of understanding yet, but this patch seems to fix this
> specific issue.
> diff --git a/src/jobs.c b/src/jobs.c
> index a4fada0..57c0854 100644
> --- a/src/jobs.c
> +++ b/src/jobs.c
> @@ -1136,8 +1136,6 @@ waitproc(int block, int *status)
> if (err || !block)
> break;
>
> - block = 0;
> -
> sigfillset(&mask);
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &mask, &oldmask);
>
This patch is not correct as it makes dash busy-wait for the second and
further processes to terminate. Also, I think aborting the wait builtin
with 128+SIGCHLD is the correct behaviour if a trap on CHLD is active
(like any other trap). This requires a more sophisticated handling of
pendingsigs so that an untrapped SIGCHLD does not overwrite a trapped
signal.
I wonder why this hasn't been noticed before, as this is the most common
use of the wait builtin. I can even reproduce the regression with the
test script in 3800d49's commit message: sometimes I see a line *** 148
meaning that the wait builtin was aborted by SIGCHLD (even though no
CHLD trap has been set); however only on an SMP system. (This is on
FreeBSD; I hacked mksignames.c to compile and work, although realtime
signals are missing.)
--
Jilles Tjoelker
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-22 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-19 19:08 wait regression in 3800d4 Gerrit Pape
2010-05-22 21:28 ` Jilles Tjoelker [this message]
2010-05-27 11:39 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100522212852.GA36029@stack.nl \
--to=jilles@stack.nl \
--cc=dash@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox