From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: shift "fatal error" Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 02:27:17 -0500 Message-ID: <20110326072717.GA26739@elie> References: <20110310192333.GE3948@wopr.local.invalid> <20110315213116.GA53303@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:41746 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753327Ab1CZH1Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2011 03:27:24 -0400 Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so1810464iwn.19 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: dash-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dash@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Muresan Cc: Jilles Tjoelker , dash@vger.kernel.org Dan Muresan wrote: > After reading the other part of the spec (about syntax errors in > utilities), I reached the conclusion that dash has just enough excuses > in the spec and in history to behave as it currently does I have no strong opinion about this (and indeed the spec and history not giving a clear answer reduces my motivation) but if you'd like to change the spec, it's very easy. See http://www.opengroup.org/austin/ Hope that helps, Jonathan