From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Rudolf Polzer <divverent@xonotic.org>
Cc: dash@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug: temporary assignments vs shell function
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:26:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110714092615.GA15476@elie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110714083455.GA25362@div0.qc.to>
Hi,
Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> foo=bar func
> echo "foo is now $foo"
>
> will export foo=bar in global scope (i.e. it affects the execution environment
> after the function call).
[...]
> A shell function however isn't a "special built-in" and also counts as a
> "command name", thus the last echo line really should output "foo is now foo",
> which it does in e.g. bash and the FreeBSD /bin/sh.
From XCU 2.9.5:
| When a function is executed, it shall have the syntax-error and
| variable-assignment properties described for special built-in
| utilities in the enumerated list at the beginning of Section 2.14.
This seems to be one of those odd cases where "bash -o posix" behaves
differently from bash. Based on this test:
$sh -c 'func () { :; }; foo=bar func; echo $foo'
dash, ksh93, bash -o posix, pdksh and its derivatives, zsh with
"emulate sh", and busybox sh implement the specified behavior. I'm
surprised to hear your copy of FreeBSD sh behaves differently.
Meanwhile I agree with you that this could be made clearer in POSIX
without too many changes (for example by adding a reference back to
section 2.9.5 in section 2.14). If you are interested in fixing that,
the kind people in the Austin group at <http://austingroupbugs.net>
would probably be interested.
Thanks for writing and hope that helps.
Regards,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-14 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-14 8:34 Bug: temporary assignments vs shell function Rudolf Polzer
2011-07-14 9:26 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2011-07-14 10:09 ` Rudolf Polzer
2011-07-14 10:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-07-31 22:19 ` Jilles Tjoelker
2011-08-01 5:59 ` Rudolf Polzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110714092615.GA15476@elie \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=dash@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=divverent@xonotic.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox