From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: [MAN] Clarify two redirection mechanisms Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:56:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20141208215615.GT16345@google.com> References: <20141208185005.GA11773@free.fr> <20141208203738.GC4010@chaz.gmail.com> <20141208212203.GA13333@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:36823 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752077AbaLHV4S (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:56:18 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r2so3582571igi.6 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:56:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141208212203.GA13333@free.fr> Sender: dash-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dash@vger.kernel.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Aulery Cc: Stephane CHAZELAS , 501566@bugs.debian.org, dash@vger.kernel.org Hi St=E9phane, St=E9phane Aulery wrote: > As for me, I'm not bothered by the word "resource". It's ok for me as > "copy". But Herbert does not agree, so I can not force him:-)). [...] > This is my last attempt, if there is no consensus I close the bug > regarding Debian. Please don't. I can handle the bug if no one is able to come up with a good wording. Thanks, Jonathan