* STATIC vs static
@ 2023-02-17 13:35 Tom Schwindl
2023-02-20 9:04 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Schwindl @ 2023-02-17 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dash
Hi all,
as I was skimming through the codebase, I noticed that sometimes there is a
macro, STATIC, used to represent the normal static. Is there a reason for that
or would a s/STATIC/static/g be welcome? Now that we are revising the prototypes
anyway I think it's the right time to bring this up.
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: STATIC vs static
2023-02-17 13:35 STATIC vs static Tom Schwindl
@ 2023-02-20 9:04 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2023-02-20 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Schwindl; +Cc: dash
Tom Schwindl <schwindl@posteo.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as I was skimming through the codebase, I noticed that sometimes there is a
> macro, STATIC, used to represent the normal static. Is there a reason for that
> or would a s/STATIC/static/g be welcome? Now that we are revising the prototypes
> anyway I think it's the right time to bring this up.
There is no reason why STATIC should exist in dash. But if we're
going to clean it up we should make the whole function prototype and
definition consistent and not just the one word.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-20 9:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-17 13:35 STATIC vs static Tom Schwindl
2023-02-20 9:04 ` Herbert Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox