From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Kellas Subject: dash -n and -v not implemented? Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:47:39 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43614 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754600Ab0HWUKF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:10:05 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OndLH-0006wO-5m for dash@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:10:03 +0200 Received: from c-76-24-28-236.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([76.24.28.236]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:10:03 +0200 Received: from Adam.Kellas by c-76-24-28-236.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:10:03 +0200 Sender: dash-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dash@vger.kernel.org To: dash@vger.kernel.org Am I missing something, or do the -n and -v flags have no effect? The following compares the behavior of bash, ksh, and dash (bash requires an extra flag to suppress startup files): % ksh -v -n -c uname uname % bash --norc -v -n uname uname % dash -v -n -c uname Linux AK