From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/17] [DCCP]: Simplify jump labels in dccp_v{4,6}_rcv
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:51:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610251651.40865@strip-the-willow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610241459.52912@strip-the-willow>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 656 bytes --]
I have verified this patch again and discovered a stupid mistake/bug
in the posting:
* control goes from: no_dccp_socket: => discard_and_relse: => sock_put(sk)
* BOOM! (no socket)
I therefore re-send the corrected patch, put it online as
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patch-backlog/07a_1_simplify_vX_rcv.diff
Apart from the bug fix, the patch is now
* much smaller therefore easier to read/review
* effectively boils down to format changes / removal of do_time_wait label
I have updated the repository on http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patch-backlog/,
all other patches have been refreshed relative to this one.
Gerrit
[-- Attachment #2: 07a_1_simplify_vX_rcv.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3045 bytes --]
[DCCP]: Simplify jump labels in dccp_v{4,6}_rcv
This is a code simplification and was singled out from the
DCCPv6 Oops patch on
http://www.mail-archive.com/dccp@vger.kernel.org/msg00600.html
It mainly makes the code consistent between ipv{4,6}.c for the functions
dccp_v4_rcv
dccp_v6_rcv
and removes the do_time_wait label to simplify code somewhat.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
---
net/dccp/ipv4.c | 17 +++++------------
net/dccp/ipv6.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -910,8 +910,7 @@ static int dccp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *s
dccp_pr_debug_cat("\n");
} else {
DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq = dccp_hdr_ack_seq(skb);
- dccp_pr_debug_cat(", ack=%llu\n",
- (unsigned long long)
+ dccp_pr_debug_cat(", ack=%llu\n", (unsigned long long)
DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq);
}
@@ -940,11 +939,10 @@ static int dccp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *s
* Generate Reset(No Connection) unless P.type == Reset
* Drop packet and return
*/
-
if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT) {
- dccp_pr_debug("sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT: "
- "do_time_wait\n");
- goto do_time_wait;
+ dccp_pr_debug("sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT: do_time_wait\n");
+ inet_twsk_put(inet_twsk(sk));
+ goto no_dccp_socket;
}
if (!xfrm4_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
@@ -968,17 +966,12 @@ no_dccp_socket:
}
discard_it:
- /* Discard frame. */
kfree_skb(skb);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
discard_and_relse:
sock_put(sk);
goto discard_it;
-
-do_time_wait:
- inet_twsk_put(inet_twsk(sk));
- goto no_dccp_socket;
}
static struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops dccp_ipv4_af_ops = {
--- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
@@ -1071,8 +1071,11 @@ static int dccp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff **
* Generate Reset(No Connection) unless P.type == Reset
* Drop packet and return
*/
- if (sk == NULL)
+ if (sk == NULL) {
+ dccp_pr_debug("failed to look up flow ID in table and "
+ "get corresponding socket\n");
goto no_dccp_socket;
+ }
/*
* Step 2:
@@ -1080,8 +1083,11 @@ static int dccp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff **
* Generate Reset(No Connection) unless P.type == Reset
* Drop packet and return
*/
- if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT)
- goto do_time_wait;
+ if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT) {
+ dccp_pr_debug("sk->sk_state == DCCP_TIME_WAIT: do_time_wait\n");
+ inet_twsk_put(inet_twsk(sk));
+ goto no_dccp_socket;
+ }
if (!xfrm6_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
goto discard_and_relse;
@@ -1101,22 +1107,14 @@ no_dccp_socket:
DCCP_RESET_CODE_NO_CONNECTION;
dccp_v6_ctl_send_reset(skb);
}
-discard_it:
-
- /*
- * Discard frame
- */
+discard_it:
kfree_skb(skb);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
discard_and_relse:
sock_put(sk);
goto discard_it;
-
-do_time_wait:
- inet_twsk_put(inet_twsk(sk));
- goto no_dccp_socket;
}
static struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops dccp_ipv6_af_ops = {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-24 13:59 [PATCH 7/17] [DCCP]: Simplify jump labels in dccp_v{4,6}_rcv Gerrit Renker
2006-10-25 15:51 ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610251651.40865@strip-the-willow \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox