[PATCH 3/7]: Fix two BUGs in sending rate computation

[Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>]

[DCCP]: Fix two bugs in sending rate computation

This fixes 
 1) a bug in the recomputation of the sending rate by the nofeedback
    timer when no feedback at all has so far been sent by the receiver: 
    min_t was used instead of max_t, which is wrong (cf. RFC 3448, p. 10);

 2) an error in the computation of larger initial windows: instead of
    min(... max()) (cf. RFC 4342, 5.), the code had used max(... max()).

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
---
 net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_no_feedback_time
 	switch (hctx->ccid3hctx_state) {
 	case TFRC_SSTATE_NO_FBACK:
 		/* RFC 3448, 4.4: Halve send rate directly */
-		hctx->ccid3hctx_x = min_t(u32, hctx->ccid3hctx_x / 2,
+		hctx->ccid3hctx_x = max_t(u32, hctx->ccid3hctx_x / 2,
 					       hctx->ccid3hctx_s / TFRC_T_MBI);
 
 		ccid3_pr_debug("%s, sk=%p, state=%s, updated tx rate to %d "
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_packet_recv(stru
 		if (hctx->ccid3hctx_state = TFRC_SSTATE_NO_FBACK) {
 			/* Use Larger Initial Windows [RFC 4342, sec. 5]
 			 * We deviate in that we use `s' instead of `MSS'. */
-			u16 w_init = max(    4 * hctx->ccid3hctx_s,
+			u16 w_init = min(    4 * hctx->ccid3hctx_s,
 					 max(2 * hctx->ccid3hctx_s, 4380));
 			hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt  = r_sample;
 			hctx->ccid3hctx_x    = usecs_div(w_init, r_sample);