From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 18/29] Reduce time spent while write-lock is held
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:16:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070412211638.GS21292@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
This minimizes the time during which the `write_lock' is held: by using a
temporary list_head and re-adjusting the pointers of the old list accordingly.
The clean-up operation can then safely be done outside the lock, since the
newly created list is then `homeless'.
1. For dccp_tx_hist_purge, this is conveniently done by using list_replace_init,
2. the case for dccp_tx_hist_purge_older is analogous and, in the absence of a
matching library function, done manually;
3. the `dangerous' function dccp_tx_hist_purge_older has been removed by
merging its functionality into dccp_tx_hist_get_send_time.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
---
net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.h | 4 ---
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c
index a5dc450..02bf58f 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c
@@ -87,6 +87,16 @@ void dccp_tx_hist_delete(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_tx_hist_delete);
+static void __dccp_tx_hist_wipe(struct list_head *head, struct kmem_cache *slab)
+{
+ struct dccp_tx_hist_entry *entry, *next;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, head, dccphtx_node) {
+ list_del(&entry->dccphtx_node);
+ kmem_cache_free(slab, entry);
+ }
+}
+
/**
* dccp_tx_hist_get_send_time - Retrieve timestamp of sent packet
*
@@ -101,6 +111,7 @@ int dccp_tx_hist_get_send_time(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist,
struct timeval *t_send)
{
struct dccp_tx_hist_entry *entry;
+ struct list_head free_this;
int found = 0;
write_lock_bh(&dccp_tx_hist_lock);
@@ -108,12 +119,20 @@ int dccp_tx_hist_get_send_time(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist,
if (entry->dccphtx_seqno = seq) {
found = 1;
*t_send = entry->dccphtx_tstamp;
+ /* forget/free all entries older than this one */
+ free_this.next = entry->dccphtx_node.next;
+ free_this.next->prev = &free_this;
+ free_this.prev = list->prev;
+ free_this.prev->next = &free_this;
+
+ entry->dccphtx_node.next = list;
+ list->prev = &entry->dccphtx_node;
break;
}
+ write_unlock_bh(&dccp_tx_hist_lock);
if (found)
- dccp_tx_hist_purge_older(hist, list, entry);
- write_unlock_bh(&dccp_tx_hist_lock);
+ __dccp_tx_hist_wipe(&free_this, hist->dccptxh_slab);
return found;
}
@@ -132,32 +151,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_tx_hist_add_entry);
void dccp_tx_hist_purge(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist, struct list_head *list)
{
- struct dccp_tx_hist_entry *entry, *next;
+ struct list_head free_this;
write_lock_bh(&dccp_tx_hist_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, list, dccphtx_node) {
- list_del_init(&entry->dccphtx_node);
- dccp_tx_hist_entry_delete(hist, entry);
- }
+ list_replace_init(list, &free_this);
write_unlock_bh(&dccp_tx_hist_lock);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_tx_hist_purge);
-/* XXX careful, this one is not lock-protected */
-void dccp_tx_hist_purge_older(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist,
- struct list_head *list,
- struct dccp_tx_hist_entry *packet)
-{
- struct dccp_tx_hist_entry *next;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(packet, next, list, dccphtx_node) {
- list_del_init(&packet->dccphtx_node);
- dccp_tx_hist_entry_delete(hist, packet);
- }
+ __dccp_tx_hist_wipe(&free_this, hist->dccptxh_slab);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_tx_hist_purge_older);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_tx_hist_purge);
/*
* Receiver History Routines
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.h b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.h
index 402ac90..6208188 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.h
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.h
@@ -95,10 +95,6 @@ static inline void dccp_tx_hist_entry_delete(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist,
extern void dccp_tx_hist_purge(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist,
struct list_head *list);
-extern void dccp_tx_hist_purge_older(struct dccp_tx_hist *hist,
- struct list_head *list,
- struct dccp_tx_hist_entry *next);
-
/*
* Receiver History data structures and declarations
*/
--
1.5.0.6
reply other threads:[~2007-04-12 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070412211638.GS21292@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox