DCCP protocol discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sensitivity of TFRC throughput equation wrt to changes of RTT
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:33:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070413.123356.21601263.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704131303.03072@strip-the-willow>

From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:03:02 +0100

> RFC 3448 gives in section 8 the following alternative format
> of the throughput equation (which is directly responsible for
> the alllowed sending rate X):
> 
>               s
>       X =  --------
>            R * f(p)
> 
> This shows that the dependence is reciprocal. Thus using an RTT
> which differs by a factor of 10 to account for in-stack processing
> results an a throughput reduction of factor 10.
> 
> In other words, 90 Mbits/sec becomes 9 Mbits/sec.

What I'd like to know in all this is why the RTT influences the
sending rate at all in such a manner.  Please teach me :)

If I have a 10gbit pipe all the way to the planet mars I should
still be feeding that pipe at a rate of 10gbit. :)

TCP doesn't have any of these problems, and we use incredibly coarse
timestamping for RTTs.  We get jiffies granularity at best, with many
in-stack delays, and we still send at full line rate over large RTTs.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-13 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-13 12:03 Sensitivity of TFRC throughput equation wrt to changes of RTT Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 19:33 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-04-13 19:52 ` Ian McDonald
2007-04-13 20:27 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-04-13 20:43 ` David Miller
2007-04-13 20:54 ` David Miller
2007-04-14  5:43 ` Eddie Kohler
2007-04-15 16:15 ` Gerrit Renker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070413.123356.21601263.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox