From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:28:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] CCID4: Provides organization to the initial Message-Id: <20070921142824.GA10051@ghostprotocols.net> List-Id: References: <5bc4c4570709201054n1beda2d8x6bfdcda0cbcbaa35@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bc4c4570709201054n1beda2d8x6bfdcda0cbcbaa35@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: dccp@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:02:40PM +0300, Tommi Saviranta escreveu: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 14:54:32 -0300, =E3=83=84 Leandro Sales wrote: > > diff -uprN dccp-ccid4.base/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile > > dccp-ccid4/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile > > --- dccp-ccid4.base/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile 2007-09-20 11:45:30.0000000= 00 -0300 > > +++ dccp-ccid4/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile 2007-09-20 11:55:23.000000000 -0= 300 >=20 > Signed-off-by: Tommi Saviranta >=20 > By the way one more question about acking/signing patches. When talking > about trivial patches such as this, is there a consensus on if simple > patches need to be (or should be) acked or signed in the first place? >=20 > Personally I was a little reluctant to sign this one, but signed it > anyway as requested. It is always good to show that you agree with the change, read Documentation/SubmittingPatches to get more food for thought. I'll try to harvest the signatures when I get to review/merge the patches. And keep up the good work, I'm really happy with how healthy the DCCP on Linux developer community is getting, thank you all! - Arnaldo