From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/9]: Provide feature negotiation for minimum-checksum-coverage
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:30:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709281630.27686@strip-the-willow> (raw)
[DCCP]: Provide feature negotiation for minimum-checksum-coverage
This provides feature negotiation for server minimum checksum coverage
which so far has been missing.
Since sender/receiver coverage values range only from 0...15, their
type has also been reduced in size from u16 to u4.
Feature-negotiation options are now generated for both sender and receiver
coverage, i.e. when the peer has `forgotten' to enable partial coverage
then feature negotiation will automatically enable (negotiate) the partial
coverage value for this connection.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
---
include/linux/dccp.h | 4 +--
net/dccp/proto.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/dccp.h
+++ b/include/linux/dccp.h
@@ -545,8 +545,8 @@ struct dccp_sock {
struct dccp_ts_echo *dccps_tstamp;
__u16 dccps_l_ack_ratio;
__u16 dccps_r_ack_ratio;
- __u16 dccps_pcslen;
- __u16 dccps_pcrlen;
+ __u8 dccps_pcslen:4;
+ __u8 dccps_pcrlen:4;
unsigned long dccps_ndp_count;
__u32 dccps_mss_cache;
unsigned long dccps_rate_last;
--- a/net/dccp/proto.c
+++ b/net/dccp/proto.c
@@ -469,6 +469,41 @@ static int dccp_setsockopt_change(struct
return rc;
}
+static int dccp_setsockopt_cscov(struct sock *sk, int cscov, bool rx)
+{
+ u8 *list, len;
+ int i, rc;
+
+ if (cscov < 0 || cscov > 15)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (rx)
+ dccp_sk(sk)->dccps_pcrlen = cscov;
+ else
+ dccp_sk(sk)->dccps_pcslen = cscov;
+ /*
+ * Populate a list of permissible values, in the range cscov...15. This
+ * is necessary since feature negotiation of single values only works if
+ * both sides incidentally choose the same value. Since the list starts
+ * lowest-value first, negotiation will pick the smallest shared value.
+ */
+ if (cscov = 0)
+ return 0;
+ len = 16 - cscov;
+
+ list = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (list = NULL)
+ return -ENOBUFS;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ list[i] = cscov++;
+
+ rc = dccp_feat_register_change(sk, DCCPF_MIN_CSUM_COVER, rx, list, len);
+
+ kfree(list);
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int do_dccp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
char __user *optval, int optlen)
{
@@ -502,20 +537,11 @@ static int do_dccp_setsockopt(struct soc
else
dp->dccps_server_timewait = (val != 0);
break;
- case DCCP_SOCKOPT_SEND_CSCOV: /* sender side, RFC 4340, sec. 9.2 */
- if (val < 0 || val > 15)
- err = -EINVAL;
- else
- dp->dccps_pcslen = val;
+ case DCCP_SOCKOPT_SEND_CSCOV:
+ err = dccp_setsockopt_cscov(sk, val, false);
break;
- case DCCP_SOCKOPT_RECV_CSCOV: /* receiver side, RFC 4340 sec. 9.2.1 */
- if (val < 0 || val > 15)
- err = -EINVAL;
- else {
- dp->dccps_pcrlen = val;
- /* FIXME: add feature negotiation,
- * ChangeL(MinimumChecksumCoverage, val) */
- }
+ case DCCP_SOCKOPT_RECV_CSCOV:
+ err = dccp_setsockopt_cscov(sk, val, true);
break;
default:
err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-28 15:30 Gerrit Renker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-01 18:44 [PATCH 6/9]: Provide feature negotiation for minimum-checksum-coverage Ian McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709281630.27686@strip-the-willow \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox