public inbox for dccp@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] ipv4: First steps toward removing RTO_ONLINK
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 03:10:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ee8fb0d-aeb4-5010-bc8c-16cbd6e88eff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1650470610.git.gnault@redhat.com>

On 4/20/22 5:21 PM, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> RTO_ONLINK is a flag that allows to reduce the scope of route lookups.
> It's stored in a normally unused bit of the ->flowi4_tos field, in
> struct flowi4. However it has several problems:
> 
>  * This bit is also used by ECN. Although ECN bits are supposed to be
>    cleared before doing a route lookup, it happened that some code
>    paths didn't properly sanitise their ->flowi4_tos. So this mechanism
>    is fragile and we had bugs in the past where ECN bits slipped in and
>    could end up being erroneously interpreted as RTO_ONLINK.
> 
>  * A dscp_t type was recently introduced to ensure ECN bits are cleared
>    during route lookups. ->flowi4_tos is the most important structure
>    field to convert, but RTO_ONLINK prevents such conversion, as dscp_t
>    mandates that ECN bits (where RTO_ONLINK is stored) be zero.
> 
> Therefore we need to stop using RTO_ONLINK altogether. Fortunately
> RTO_ONLINK isn't a necessity. Instead of passing a flag in ->flowi4_tos
> to tell the route lookup function to restrict the scope, we can simply
> initialise the scope correctly.
> 

I believe the set looks ok. I think the fib test coverage in selftests
could use more tests to cover tos.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20 23:21 [PATCH net-next 0/3] ipv4: First steps toward removing RTO_ONLINK Guillaume Nault
2022-04-22  3:10 ` David Ahern [this message]
2022-04-22 11:02 ` Guillaume Nault
2022-04-22 12:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ee8fb0d-aeb4-5010-bc8c-16cbd6e88eff@kernel.org \
    --to=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox