From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:06:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM Message-Id: <482B0DF8.9060001@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20080513072853.GB4514@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080513072853.GB4514@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: dccp@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit Renker wrote: > ... but it would still be good to have. > [...] Thanks, but I think I got this already from previous mails. The question is: is either DCCP or UDPlite important enough to be returned in the default list when socktype and protocol are zero? - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIKw342ijCOnn/RHQRAmnrAKCO0sevJbyZXNoFG12jSg1NjPC+5wCfUlyH cLqvVRQ1gmTkkwl5JnqA9go=QRU/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----