From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:43:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] [DCCP]: Deprecate SOCK_DCCP in favour of SOCK_DGRAM Message-Id: <482B24CD.2040209@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20080513072853.GB4514@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080513072853.GB4514@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: dccp@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit Renker wrote: > But either is important be considered when a user unambiguously specifies > ai_socktype and/or ai_protocol; to avoid bad/brittle workarounds. OK, I added the support. Will be in glibc 2.9. But what about $subject? What is the story with SOCK_DCCP? I added it now but if it's going away I'd rather remove it. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIKyTN2ijCOnn/RHQRAhyWAJoDEgLDYcL/VUQyz5ykje2r4FWVFwCbBdvq U1W/yHRv5cAuuWr4927IGUw=rjjM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----