public inbox for dccp@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: ioctl: Use kernel memory on protocol ioctl callbacks
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 08:43:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIGUofpP4k24qfQs@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230606180045.827659-1-leitao@debian.org>

Hello Kuniyuki,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:31:42AM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > +/* This is the most common ioctl prep function, where the result (4 bytes) is
> > + * copied back to userspace if the ioctl() returns successfully. No input is
> > + * copied from userspace as input argument.
> > + */
> > +static int sock_ioctl_out(struct sock *sk, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
> > +{
> > +	int ret, karg = 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = sk->sk_prot->ioctl(sk, cmd, &karg);
> 
> We need READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot) as IPv4 conversion or ULP chnage could
> occur at the same time.

Thanks for the heads-up. I would like to pick you brain and understand
a bit more about READ_ONCE() and what is the situation that READ_ONCE()
will solve.

Is the situation related to when sock_ioctl_out() start to execute, and
"sk->sk_prot" changes in a different thread? If that is the case, the
arguments (cmd and arg) will be from the "previous" instance.

Also, grepping for "sk->sk_prot->", I see more than a bunch of calls
that do not use READ_ONCE() barrier. Why is this case different?

Thank you

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-06 18:00 [PATCH net-next v6] net: ioctl: Use kernel memory on protocol ioctl callbacks Breno Leitao
2023-06-07 12:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-06-07 14:45 ` David Ahern
2023-06-07 17:31 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-06-08  7:39 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-06-08  8:43 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2023-06-08 13:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-06-08 14:35 ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIGUofpP4k24qfQs@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox