public inbox for dccp@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: ioctl: Use kernel memory on protocol ioctl callbacks
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:34:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1074987-c3ce-56cd-3005-beb5a3c55ef9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230525125503.400797-1-leitao@debian.org>

On 5/25/23 9:05 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> +/* A wrapper around sock ioctls, which copies the data from userspace
>> + * (depending on the protocol/ioctl), and copies back the result to userspace.
>> + * The main motivation for this function is to pass kernel memory to the
>> + * protocol ioctl callbacks, instead of userspace memory.
>> + */
>> +int sk_ioctl(struct sock *sk, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
>> +{
>> +       int rc = 1;
>> +
>> +       if (ipmr_is_sk(sk))
>> +               rc = ipmr_sk_ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
>> +       else if (ip6mr_is_sk(sk))
>> +               rc = ip6mr_sk_ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
>> +       else if (phonet_is_sk(sk))
>> +               rc = phonet_sk_ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
> 
> I don't understand what this buys us vs testing the sk_family,
> sk_protocol and cmd here.

To keep protocol specific code out of core files is the reason I
suggested it.

> 
> It introduces even deeper dependencies on the protocol specific
> header files. And the CONFIG issues that result from that. And it
> adds a bunch of wrappers that are only used once.
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25 12:54 [PATCH net-next v3] net: ioctl: Use kernel memory on protocol ioctl callbacks Breno Leitao
2023-05-25 14:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-05-25 14:54 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-25 15:03 ` David Ahern
2023-05-25 15:05 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-05-25 15:34 ` David Ahern [this message]
2023-05-25 16:06 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-05-26  8:49 ` Breno Leitao
2023-05-26  9:08 ` Breno Leitao
2023-05-26 14:09 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-05-28 18:05 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a1074987-c3ce-56cd-3005-beb5a3c55ef9@kernel.org \
    --to=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox