Devicetree Compiler
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>
Cc: jdl@jdl.com, devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dtc: parser: Add label while overriding nodes
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:48:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150223014813.GB4536@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424378462-22105-1-git-send-email-nikhil.nd@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1998 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:11:02AM +0530, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote:
> This patch changes the dtc grammar to allow following syntax
> 
> i2cexp: &i2c2 {
>     ...
> };
> 
> Current device tree compiler allows to define multiple labels when defining
> the device node the first time. Typically device nodes are defined in
> DTSI files. Now these nodes can be overwritten for updating some of the
> properties. Typically, device nodes are overridden in DTS files.
> 
> When working with adapter boards, most of the time adapter board can fit to
> multiple base boards. But depending on which base board it is connected to,
> the devices on the adapter board would be children of different devices.
> 
> e.g. On dra7-evm.dts, i2c2 is exported for expansion connector whereas
> on dra72-evm.dts, i2c5 is exported for expansion connector.
> This causes a problem when writing a generic device tree file for
> the adapter board. Because, you cannot know whether all the devices on
> adapter board are present on i2c or i2c5.
> 
> The problem can be solved by adding a common label (e.g. i2cexp) in both
> of the DTS files when overriding the device nodes for i2c2 or i2c5.
> This way, generic adapter board file would override the i2cexp. And
> depending on which base board you use the adapter board, all the devices
> are automatically added for correct device nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>

Applied, thanks.

I did tweak the testcase to use dtbs_unordered_equal instead of going
through the set of tree1 tests.

The fact that you can only apply a single label by this method is a
bit of a wart, but it's something we can fix later.  I had a look at
it and (as I suspect you already discovered) it's surprisingly
complicated to do so.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-23  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-19 20:41 [PATCH v2] dtc: parser: Add label while overriding nodes Nikhil Devshatwar
2015-02-23  1:48 ` David Gibson [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20150223014813.GB4536-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-23  6:01     ` Devshatwar, Nikhil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150223014813.GB4536@voom.redhat.com \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jdl@jdl.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikhil.nd@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox