From: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jon Loeliger <jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Simon Glass <sjg-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro-uWyLwvC0a2jby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fdt: Add a function to count strings
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:44:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150717134423.GH25179@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150717091008.GC3057@ulmo>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3893 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:29:35PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:41:30PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:13:57PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Given a device tree node and a property name, the fdt_count_strings()
> > > > > function counts the number of strings found in the property value.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > libfdt/fdt_ro.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++
> > > > > libfdt/libfdt.h | 9 ++++++++
> > > > > tests/.gitignore | 1 +
> > > > > tests/Makefile.tests | 1 +
> > > > > tests/run_tests.sh | 3 +++
> > > > > tests/strings.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > tests/strings.dts | 10 ++++++++
> > > > > 7 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
> > > > > create mode 100644 tests/strings.c
> > > > > create mode 100644 tests/strings.dts
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_ro.c b/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
> > > > > index a65e4b5b72b6..874975a0d8ad 100644
> > > > > --- a/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
> > > > > +++ b/libfdt/fdt_ro.c
> > > > > @@ -538,6 +538,26 @@ int fdt_stringlist_contains(const char *strlist, int listlen, const char *str)
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +int fdt_count_strings(const void *fdt, int nodeoffset, const char *property)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + int length, i, count = 0;
> > > > > + const char *list;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + list = fdt_getprop(fdt, nodeoffset, property, &length);
> > > > > + if (!list)
> > > > > + return -length;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
> > > > > + int len = strlen(list);
> > > >
> > > > I like the concept of these patches, but this implementation is unsafe
> > > > if the given property does not, in fact, contain a list of \0
> > > > terminated strings.
> > >
> > > This should be fixed in v2 of the patches. This isn't quite as simple as
> > > using strnlen() instead of strlen() because it also means we need extra
> > > handling for the case where a NUL byte isn't found within the value.
> >
> > Yes, I suspect it will actually be easier to use memchr().
>
> I don't see how that would make it easier. The problematic bit isn't
> about determining whether or not the NUL byte is there. The problematic
> bit is determining what to do about it. For example we could enforce
> that these functions only work on well-defined properties, that is,
> properties that end with a NUL-byte. Currently we don't do that in
> fdt_find_string() and fdt_get_string() for performance reasons. For
> fdt_count_strings() the check is implicit because the last string would
> not be bounded by the property value if it wasn't terminated with a NUL
> byte.
Yeah, true; memchr() was just the first implementation that popped
into my head.
So, actually checking for a final \0 in advance isn't a real
performance cost - getprop already gives you the total property
length, so you can check if you have a valid stringlist in O(1).
> It would be easy to add this additional check as a way to short-circuit
> implementations and abort early on malformed property values, but that
> would be additional work that most users may not care about.
The implementation you have now seems fine to me - only thing I'm
still thinking about is whether I like the function names or not.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 11:13 [PATCH 0/3] Add a couple of string-related functions Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <1436958839-14793-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-15 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] fdt: Add a function to count strings Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <1436958839-14793-2-git-send-email-thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-15 13:41 ` David Gibson
[not found] ` <20150715134130.GA1567-RXTfZT5YzpxwFLYp8hBm2A@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-16 11:13 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-16 12:29 ` David Gibson
[not found] ` <20150716122935.GD25179-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-17 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2015-07-17 13:44 ` David Gibson [this message]
2015-07-15 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] fdt: Add a function to get the index of a string Thierry Reding
2015-07-15 11:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] fdt: Add functions to retrieve strings Thierry Reding
2015-07-15 13:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add a couple of string-related functions Jon Loeliger
[not found] ` <E1ZFMkd-0002ir-O5-h9b8CULRd+FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-15 21:45 ` Simon Glass
[not found] ` <CAPnjgZ12VVSDkALDDg31Sgwo1PpFPfE10GFtrseHWpRX1re-HQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-16 5:27 ` David Gibson
[not found] ` <20150716052716.GB25179-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-16 16:56 ` Simon Glass
[not found] ` <CAPnjgZ0FQvjkC=LUWeCgeDw+x+DePyaNQ=CiC+ht86U2KY_BMA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-16 23:40 ` David Gibson
[not found] ` <20150716234007.GE25179-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-20 2:19 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150717134423.GH25179@voom.redhat.com \
--to=david-xt8fgy+axnrb3ne2bgzf6laj5h9x9tb+@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sjg-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro-uWyLwvC0a2jby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).