Re: [PATCH] libfdt: Correct condition for reordering blocks

[David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1074 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:00:33AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> This condition uses bitwise OR but should be logical OR. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Applied, thanks.

> ---
> 
>  libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> index 524b520..93e4a2b 100644
> --- a/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> +++ b/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ int fdt_open_into(const void *fdt, void *buf, int bufsize)
>  			return struct_size;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) |
> +	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) ||
>  	    !fdt_blocks_misordered_(fdt, mem_rsv_size, struct_size)) {
>  		/* no further work necessary */
>  		err = fdt_move(fdt, buf, bufsize);

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]