devicetree-compiler.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checks: Relax avoid_unnecessary_addr_size check to allow child ranges properties
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:55:19 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyqwZzxn_45bLlK1@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d2ccf80d7cc8ba85ac379c99860bda02f29845c.camel@pengutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4394 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:32:54PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Mo, 2024-10-28 at 13:42 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > Do not fail the unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells check if any
> > > children of the node have a "ranges" property.
> > 
> > I think this is correct, but I had to think abuot it for a while,
> > because it's subtler than it looks.
> > 
> > If there is no 'ranges' in the node itself, then the child devices'
> > address space is not mapped into the parent bus.  Of course, you can
> > still establish a local address space for them that (e.g.) could be
> > accessed indirectly via registers in this bridge device.
> > 
> > Having a child device which acts as a bridge from this local address
> > to another subordinate address space, but no children with any
> > registers directly on the local bus seems odd... but it is logically
> > possible.
> > 
> > Given the subtlety, it would be pretty nice to add an explanatory
> > comment about what this is check for and what some of the edge cases
> > are.
> 
> Thank you. Can I steal your wording and add the following comment
> inside the for_each_child() loop:
> 
>  /*
>   * Even if the child devices' address space is not mapped into
>   * the parent bus (no 'ranges' property on node), children can
>   * still have registers on a local bus, or map local addresses
>   * to another subordinate address space. The properties on the
>   * child nodes then make #address-cells/#size-cells necessary:
>   */

Sure!

> The specific reason for this patch is a PCI device tree overlay [1]
> where the '#address-cells'/'#size-cells' properties are on the
> __overlay__ node and a child simple-bus node contains the 'ranges'
> property mapping between BAR space and the local bus.
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014124636.24221-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com/

Hrm... two things strike me as suspicious about that example.

1) The __overlay__ node is the PCI bus root... which should already
have #address-cells and #size-cells in the base tree; it's PCI so
those values are known and standard.

2) The PCI<->simple-bus bridge must surely have at least the normal
configuration space registers, and so should have a 'reg' property as
well as 'ranges'.


> 
> > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqKebRL454poAYZ9i=sCsHqGzmocLy0psQcng-79UWJB-A@mail.gmail.com/
> > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > >  checks.c | 10 +++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> > > index 6e06aeab5503..76fdee2ed030 100644
> > > --- a/checks.c
> > > +++ b/checks.c
> > > @@ -1217,9 +1217,7 @@ WARNING(avoid_default_addr_size, check_avoid_default_addr_size, NULL,
> > >  static void check_avoid_unnecessary_addr_size(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti,
> > >  					      struct node *node)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct property *prop;
> > >  	struct node *child;
> > > -	bool has_reg = false;
> > >  
> > >  	if (!node->parent || node->addr_cells < 0 || node->size_cells < 0)
> > >  		return;
> > > @@ -1228,13 +1226,11 @@ static void check_avoid_unnecessary_addr_size(struct check *c, struct dt_info *d
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > >  	for_each_child(node, child) {
> > > -		prop = get_property(child, "reg");
> > > -		if (prop)
> > > -			has_reg = true;
> > > +		if (get_property(child, "reg") || get_property(child, "ranges"))
> > > +			return;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	if (!has_reg)
> > > -		FAIL(c, dti, node, "unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without \"ranges\", \"dma-ranges\" or child \"reg\" property");
> > > +	FAIL(c, dti, node, "unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without \"ranges\", \"dma-ranges\" or child \"reg\" property");
> > 
> > ..also this message needs updating to reference child "ranges" as well.
> 
> I'll change it to:
> 
>   "unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without \"ranges\", \"dma-ranges\" or child \"reg\" or \"ranges\" property"
> 
> 
> regards
> Philipp
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25 16:13 [PATCH] checks: Relax avoid_unnecessary_addr_size check to allow child ranges properties Philipp Zabel
2024-10-28  2:42 ` David Gibson
2024-11-04 13:32   ` Philipp Zabel
2024-11-05 23:55     ` David Gibson [this message]
2024-11-06 13:23       ` Philipp Zabel
2024-11-06 21:16         ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyqwZzxn_45bLlK1@zatzit \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree-compiler@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).