From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve McIntyre Subject: Re: Device Tree Evolution Project - call notes - 29th January Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:30:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20200210183051.GC18978@linaro.org> References: <20200130135605.GQ3697@linaro.org> <3b257f2a0ccc4f9f9ca0be2de8c9e382@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vi5MacJ+vunHkQcSi6PLbZxJlgyhGIDU7UICpDpKhdM=; b=OmdOF0uV2YLhr79IV2DVOGLf/HhyAsFaPfcJbdLHVNxIpeSghrvY2rPpn4E6rc9tOU q1jkyd7pRv6a1Gp9UgXi7kBjbu+RSfSXEn0cBE4CdhtlG3u5A+T6BtQ/Ouz/ybvUXm5U +sPV87Uzlfhy03sf2Etz/ClpELT/GBCLUViTg2LAuQd7UkAnmWhEC/BrrvaOzgR/JA0y DUIzV4WiQBSeNl1nHsXbIpDyyxTDyEehZ8rYpns/Qtis4tKtiBKLFPjfXsefc68x/gwV LGY7s22hDwchxQBv//QQycROAKijTQFFauc43lUw2K6dntD3AL8R8/fxGEy845y2A717 WsgA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3b257f2a0ccc4f9f9ca0be2de8c9e382-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-spec-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Mills, William" Cc: "devicetree-spec-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "dte-all-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "Kristo, Tero" , "Valkeinen, Tomi" , "Menon, Nishanth" , "Murphy, Dan" , "tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org" , "tom.rini-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org" On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:58:26PM +0000, William Mills wrote: >Steve, > >Can TI get on the agenda for this week's meeting? > >We have a simple approach to make progress on boot loader applied overlays. >It is a small repo with just the overlays. >It builds the dtb's from the upstream kernel repo and the overlays from this repo. >We are going to do this at git.ti.com so we can make progress. >However we would like to suggest this as a simple way forward to collectively host things the kernel maintainers do not want in the kernel. >Does it make sense to host something like this in devicetree.org github account? I think so, yes - I see Grant has already responded there. >I think this is a very reasonable way forward and more practical than: >* moving all DT's out of the kernel (or sync'ing two homes etc) >* reworking overlay support to be the "one final good way" >* everyone keeping this stuff in their own vendor trees, each doing something different and generating N solutions > >We will push the repo somewhere public before the meeting. Cool. :-) >(CC'ing Tom and Tony does not constituent their endorsement, we are starting to talk with them now also) ACK! Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcintyre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs