From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Berger Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/21] dt-bindings: reserved-memory: introduce designated-movable-block Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:13:51 -0700 Message-ID: <57f19774-39a1-03a6-fe68-83d7e4b16521@gmail.com> References: <20220913195508.3511038-1-opendmb@gmail.com> <20220913195508.3511038-17-opendmb@gmail.com> <20220914145506.GA2149379-robh@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=IYYxWUkQ4C0EsxoWOU79iFj20ViO8vkpHbae7xo5rcs=; b=Na0/xpW50l0p2LWBaIM/XHkvizf5pdNgEm4MPvDGNs4tfXsVzy3nI2WggDrVrrfbfR 8vmNnBl+TiJloFytXKKx8ij7l7JHUAO5qqumCGMHz6gej+TwY2yY1uOnd6rQDW/onfEy mhfMenDe81IYCFu4mQwRrjZDNi+aIw2ZMXMs+lAyEOjSqv3xEgtOBhmny+WULZS0YZpw ZcZTsS7nWNzFQLBA2LcSPlF+DsEm3gxpzQ/M7fhQy4+5Bt/EF4tS+d1c9J4vprzq2WbL WOk5WKySaKYD+sBXvttDusj4zJ0fsKNQJHk9ppoZkcp4ZXt4nHQMWhY5rTa+LYvW5jK+ LGIA== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20220914145506.GA2149379-robh@kernel.org> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Rob Herring Cc: Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Rowand , Mike Kravetz , Muchun Song , Mike Rapoport , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Borislav Petkov , "Paul E. McKenney" , Neeraj Upadhyay , Randy Dunlap , Damien Le Moal , Florian Fainelli , David Hildenbrand , Zi Yan , Oscar Salvador , Hari On 9/14/2022 7:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:55:03PM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: >> Introduce designated-movable-block.yaml to document the >> devicetree binding for Designated Movable Block children of the >> reserved-memory node. > > What is a Designated Movable Block? This patch needs to stand on its > own. As noted in my reply to your [PATCH 00/21] comment, my intention in submitting the entire patch set (and specifically PATCH 00/21]) was to communicate this context. Now that I believe I understand that only this patch should have been submitted to the devicetree-spec mailing list, I will strive harder to make it more self contained. > > Why does this belong or need to be in DT? While my preferred method of declaring Designated Movable Blocks is through the movablecore kernel parameter, I can conceive that others may wish to take advantage of the reserved-memory DT nodes. In particular, it has the advantage that a device can claim ownership of the reserved-memory via device tree, which is something that has yet to be implemented for DMBs defined with movablecore. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Berger >> --- >> .../designated-movable-block.yaml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/designated-movable-block.yaml >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/designated-movable-block.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/designated-movable-block.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..42f846069a2e >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/designated-movable-block.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/designated-movable-block.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: /reserved-memory Designated Movable Block node binding >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org >> + >> +allOf: >> + - $ref: "reserved-memory.yaml" >> + >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + const: designated-movable-block >> + description: >> + This indicates a region of memory meant to be placed into >> + ZONE_MOVABLE. > > Don't put Linuxisms into bindings. I will avoid ZONE_MOVABLE if this commit is included in V2 of this patch set. > >> + >> +unevaluatedProperties: false >> + >> +required: >> + - compatible >> + - reusable >> + >> +examples: >> + - | >> + reserved-memory { >> + #address-cells = <0x2>; >> + #size-cells = <0x2>; >> + >> + DMB0@10800000 { >> + compatible = "designated-movable-block"; >> + reusable; >> + reg = <0x0 0x10800000 0x0 0x2d800000>; >> + }; >> + >> + DMB1@40000000 { >> + compatible = "designated-movable-block"; >> + reusable; >> + reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0x30000000>; >> + }; >> + >> + DMB2@80000000 { >> + compatible = "designated-movable-block"; >> + reusable; >> + reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x2fc00000>; >> + }; >> + }; >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> Thank you for the review! -Doug