From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <corsac@debian.org>
Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id y4BJ-vo-YVDd for <dm-crypt@saout.de>;
 Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:39:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from molly.corsac.net (molly.corsac.net [IPv6:2002:4ec0:442e::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:39:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from scapa.corsac.net (unknown [192.168.0.254])
 by molly.corsac.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C306F8332E
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 19:38:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:39:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4E7769C7.5040805@laposte.net>
References: <1316447158.7965.12.camel@zarniwoop> <1316448000.17657.3@mofo>
 <4E7769C7.5040805@laposte.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gzjpWEYrB9MXYwFtL7f4"
Message-ID: <1316626753.23302.4.camel@scapa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Questions about LUKS / LVM
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de


--=-gzjpWEYrB9MXYwFtL7f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On lun., 2011-09-19 at 18:11 +0200, Quentin Lefebvre wrote:
> > It all depends, but generally no because cpu is _so_ much
> > faster than disk these days.
>=20
> Indeed, you won't notice it on a modern computer, especially for every
> day use. It may be painful for data transfer from one encrypted disk
> to
> another encrypted disk, but you can expect very good rates anyway. It
> depends on the cipher you use, on your machine, ...
>=20
Using a modern intel cpu with aesni helps a lot too.

Regards,
--=20
Yves-Alexis

--=-gzjpWEYrB9MXYwFtL7f4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=YTj4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-gzjpWEYrB9MXYwFtL7f4--