From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbUQgmLrGbWo for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:19:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from molly.corsac.net (molly.corsac.net [IPv6:2002:4ec0:442e::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:19:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1343060350.26887.20.camel@scapa> From: Yves-Alexis Perez Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:19:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120723161242.GB27727@merlins.org> References: <20120723081407.GA872@tansi.org> <500D2B8E.3000908@redhat.com> <20120722190757.GB10089@merlins.org> <20120722202213.GA7306@fancy-poultry.org> <20120722190757.GB10089@merlins.org> <1342986452.26887.3.camel@scapa> <20120722203929.GB3925@merlins.org> <20120722214757.GA16793@tansi.org> <20120723062850.GA6931@merlins.org> <20120723081407.GA872@tansi.org> <20120723161242.GB27727@merlins.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+3JWVintwPqmfDv2Sc73" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] aes-xts-plain with aes_x86_64 makes my SSD 5x slower than my encrypted HD List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marc MERLIN Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de, Milan Broz --=-+3JWVintwPqmfDv2Sc73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On lun., 2012-07-23 at 09:12 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:14:07AM +0200, Arno Wagner wrote: > > > > SID? That would be "unstable", whit possible assorted problems. > >=20 > > Ok, sorry for my confusion, what kernel/distro are you running? > =20 > Debian testing with pieces of unstable :) > That gives me cryptsetup 1.4.3 > (but debian unstable is often not more unstable than your released fedora > core or ubuntu in my experience) >=20 [=E2=80=A6] > I'll try rebuilding a non preempt kernel just in case. Maybe try with Debian kernel first? It's just an apt-get install away and will give you a setup identical as mine. Regards, --=20 Yves-Alexis --=-+3JWVintwPqmfDv2Sc73 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJQDXl+AAoJEDBVD3hx7wuoBLkP/A+c02My0xv1/MshRAaOOoPo f2O3M17EdRZfQnMrvvMY6iRAM7sHsj8ndnKKIYrmurdMnYbYOiY+ELK/Buxr3l+V Mu1e1qVHxlud6knPaRGw+nF84ygTpx/RnsM1FtO35qKw+SYM6aqAB5lX4kcjyKjp C4GqW+Ncc1li9lnRsbYf4RNcHvMOVjPskza9Xlv8kK2mD85Jwp0+qHQ7Y0NLygvq IkS+CV0cOXtOf5wyfs5xpntJ0hY22NG/sy67hfLqo96OcFzfB9XCsFAH3sufNEoM 0K87aZyOsYLObMMpNjhna7GTYUuw1i5cNAZz5kaYTULbR+GZtr1Wr1SCnexugWGZ /NQxNO+vVcaW/3t++ZpNjnkIY9Tlh6Zk8AHImS8K1oRN/KFXX/HbLpT9M+isgTx/ 5hXbZQ2+tZZdI4IOb9xuScAjBcjmE+NjWXeffhWRUWtS2ybj9uVorxpAmX4IDyot TB254CVOHK53uhMh8dIgZ6k+vc24+U6uPb/3E2LXGbFf0oXvDEYjOrc+LzsHWBA+ +Nq8/kIxheqC4UgY8Eg0iPjvaemOp+FvBlwVrigf4fJnuS65W684E8URnqfEJgpK ejM2y6IP6OmFk58RYWqgv/+hzcKAMY71D5ywlvx1uyT4MduQ7+5Mk5k2Ztl8wwRP CvhdfvK24U0noQtm0ESo =u0v5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+3JWVintwPqmfDv2Sc73--