From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F_OjTjJoWXys for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:27:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from molly.corsac.net (molly.corsac.net [IPv6:2002:4ec0:442e::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:27:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1343071616.26887.21.camel@scapa> From: Yves-Alexis Perez Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:26:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20120723175423.GB15867@merlins.org> References: <20120722190757.GB10089@merlins.org> <20120722202213.GA7306@fancy-poultry.org> <20120722190757.GB10089@merlins.org> <1342986452.26887.3.camel@scapa> <20120722203929.GB3925@merlins.org> <20120722214757.GA16793@tansi.org> <20120723062850.GA6931@merlins.org> <20120723081407.GA872@tansi.org> <20120723161242.GB27727@merlins.org> <1343060350.26887.20.camel@scapa> <20120723175423.GB15867@merlins.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-t5PzyFnkXjHrOeyjnOuX" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] aes-xts-plain with aes_x86_64 makes my SSD 5x slower than my encrypted HD List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marc MERLIN Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Gall --=-t5PzyFnkXjHrOeyjnOuX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On lun., 2012-07-23 at 10:54 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > I'll try rebuilding a non preempt kernel just in case. > >=20 > > Maybe try with Debian kernel first? It's just an apt-get install > away > > and will give you a setup identical as mine. >=20 > I have a custom initramfs, it was easier to compile a new kernel than > to try > and get the debian one to boot my system :) >=20 > But for reference, what kernel package are you using?=20 Linux version 3.2.0-3-amd64 (Debian 3.2.21-3) (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-8) ) #1 SMP Thu Jun 28 09:07:26 UTC 2012 And I'll upgrade to 3.2.23-1 just know. --=20 Yves-Alexis --=-t5PzyFnkXjHrOeyjnOuX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJQDaWAAAoJEDBVD3hx7wuo00kQAKfw+vcQDcSK05NPtrI/H6nW 1hkGbsN7YoZcLlltgC+zGuANsHzzzEF+K3A8S53vFqIGk9Idj1ZQWZKa1bU+vesO unuDUdAP9d1mW5zRvC5W14Ih2pM3oKq09Ht3D1YXbVrvx7qForRw64zItHGc5sKt +V17bAAyU9k5Qfa450tXDXkIM85m+gsFAD/cKBki5q3Rfflkbi/H55MhvnmeLYQi mAHeDWzB03rTyDiH5kvwdU0OrjWmTi9Xmt3/eD6EkGFJCehIjvK8IbRBRnKeHJo/ Xb2iyirZVO0qCZJYQ4gBQ60X2BTD4u0uRisJ5fAQCaQ4J+i0Xl5/7/OiGUMJj7R/ nQ4W0WCYcEEbQtNTT5BowpMxHnUPhJZ+xLnqzAWjK7z1tYoLUwF9Q6JMILH8H2A0 5nQO9cZCis/1qqaFbW0o/En6IcN1J4XzTUb07Svp2iK9YQYptpniV/GLnsr0t+Uu UnpTQk+cYmJXi+i75ULdfH8VNQtr0HXpK7mu/A9Xd5CHvm/61WpjFphdhduFbsX9 VxGfgZkyP/h9Szeu8TpJvX5FiilPIsAdGyVtJBvuqML0ncAN8aSGqaQhbhs/g8/i OLrWtqr/C+Du0E8BFjbL6WMykkfngvNNdIXmMdbgaHiCE3we1MiFn8Z7a6IhB4TO jVXY+u5Ft2HaeB/JZpei =IPq+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-t5PzyFnkXjHrOeyjnOuX--