From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E8E90A7 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AuFGuc6jWNI1 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:57:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from op7.codingninjas.org (op7.codingninjas.org [209.222.52.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:57:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sschai.localnet (CPE0080c6e9d913-CM000f9f4fecc0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.249.56.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by op7.codingninjas.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B63F84E2217 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 23:57:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Sam Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 23:56:02 -0400 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908012356.03807.test532@codingninjas.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] double algorithm question E3E-2A1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Hi Roscoe, Thanks for your suggestion. I have heard this vaguely elsewhere in the past. Perhaps that is what I will do now that you bring it up again. By the way, your mail got through each time. I get that spam message too when posting. I believe what happens is that when the mailing list server sends our message to each address that is subscribed, only one person who is subscribed has some problem that triggers that message from their address. Thus your mail gets to everyone but that one person. I don't know about you, but every time I post I also get a subscribe request confirmation for some yahoo group for danish cats as well, lol. Thanks again, Sam > Getting past spam filter, attempt 4. If this doesn't work I'm giving up. > > > FWIW I wouldn't forget about Serpent, which came 2nd in the AES > selection process. From Practical Cryptography, by Niels Ferguson and > Bruce Schneier: > "If you are paranoid about the security of your data, and speed is > not important, then you should choose Seprent. During the AES process, > every serious cryptographer agreed that Serpent was the most secure > (or most conservative) of the submissions" > > -- Roscoe > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@saout.de > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt