From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tansi.org (ns.km10532-04.keymachine.de [87.118.102.195]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:30:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gatewagner.dyndns.org (84-74-164-239.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.74.164.239]) by tansi.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 000D02128007 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:30:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:30:55 +0200 From: Arno Wagner Message-ID: <20100708093055.GA5572@tansi.org> References: <1278523178.9943.5.camel@Koma-Station.localdomain> <20100707173658.GA20180@tansi.org> <1278524944.9943.9.camel@Koma-Station.localdomain> <20100707201955.GA22353@tansi.org> <4C34E72E.8070809@redhat.com> <1278536333.9943.17.camel@Koma-Station.localdomain> <4C34F02C.10704@redhat.com> <1278555755.9943.35.camel@Koma-Station.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1278555755.9943.35.camel@Koma-Station.localdomain> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] crypsetup segfaulting during luksFormat List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Lets give Milan a few days. I expect he will figure it out. I admit, I do not understand what the issue really is either and I do not have gentoo. Mazbe I should take a look at it ... Arno On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:22:35AM +0200, Sven Eschenberg wrote: > Okay, let's see: > > gcc --version > gcc (Gentoo Hardened 4.4.4-r1 p1.0, pie-0.4.5) 4.4.4 > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is > NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR > PURPOSE. > > I am not really sure it is a problem in the source, maybe some awkward > scenario. > > If you say, the source did not change, maybe you could recommend some > sort of testing scenario. I'd feel happy to contribute here. Currently I > feel just stuck... > > Regards > > -Sven > > P.S.: Last time I had to set up a mapping(initially) (as in luksFormat) > was like 1 year ago (or somethign amog these figures)... so maybe I just > did not hit the bug (before) in the last couple of months ... > > > > > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 23:22 +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 07/07/2010 10:58 PM, Sven Eschenberg wrote: > > > For starters, I'll select the easiest case, plain luksFormat without > > > special params: > > > > thanks. > > > > > The segfault comes way before the 10 seconds are over, that much I can > > > tell already. For the other info: I'm on gentoo, 10.0, hardened profile, > > > on amd64 arch. > > > > Which gcc? (gcc --version) > > > > I am using gentoo (but 32bit) for upstream testing, > > it should fail here too then:) > > > > But that code is there since 1.1.0, so I guess something in gcc/glibc > > changed probably and uncovers some old bug. > > > > > Currently no core file is created, can you give me a fast shot on how I > > > force the system to write out a core? > > > > try "ulimit -c unlimited" and then run that command > > > > you can also define where core files will be stored using > > sysctl kernel.core_pattern=//core > > > > Milan > > _______________________________________________ > > dm-crypt mailing list > > dm-crypt@saout.de > > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt > > > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@saout.de > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt > -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier