From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-fx0-f50.google.com (mail-fx0-f50.google.com [209.85.161.50]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:25:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1893022fxm.37 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:25:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Zidlicky Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:24:46 +0100 From: Richard Zidlicky Message-ID: <20101111212446.GB22415@linux-m68k.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Improving performance? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lasse Jensen Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:49:16AM +0100, Lasse Jensen wrote: > At the moment, i get 70 mb/s sequential read speed locally. I would like to > boost it to at least 100 or even more, as 1) the raw drives support way more > and 2) i would like to fill my gigabit ethernet when copying files over the > network. > > Now, what are my options? wondering if loop-AES would be faster for you? Richard