From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from citadel.alpha-force.net (citadel.alpha-force.net [193.95.228.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:13:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by citadel.alpha-force.net for dm-crypt@saout.de; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:03:01 +0100 From: Peter Message-ID: <20110214140301.b373bee9@citadel.alpha-force.net> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:03:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [dm-crypt] Memory location of the encryption key List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Hey! I've been reading Gutmann's paper on data remanence, which says that if = some data is kept in the same memory location for very little time (1 se= cond), the possibility for recovery of this data is very low, because th= e data had not yet had the time to change the relevant physical properti= es used in cold boot attacks. My question is, does dm-crypt change the m= emory location of encryption key every second=3F Does dm-crypt rewrite t= he memory location of the key when removing an active mapping=3F What ot= her cold boot attack mitigation techniques the dm-crypt does=3F Happy day, Peter