From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03UWZHjJDJ57 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:54:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:53:32 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20120416195332.GA2887@fancy-poultry.org> References: <1334536105.71826.YahooMailClassic@web171306.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <20120416024321.GB22656@tansi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120416024321.GB22656@tansi.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] simple ideas addressing ssd TRIM security concern List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 16.04.2012, Arno Wagner wrote: > > Weighing out really is the most difficult part when you have no tangible > > data: how much is it difficult to break a TRIMed and crypted device? > It is not difficult. It is impossible. If this is true, then why not use it and end of story?