From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] unusual writing speeds when benchmark speeds are high enough
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:43:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130318104359.GA8350@citd.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130318100148.GA1399@fancy-poultry.org>
On 18.03.2013 11:01, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 18.03.2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
> > The SSD i have can reach (with encryption) about 400MB/s, but that is
> > best-case performance when all moons are aligned. I haven't really
> > benchmarked the real-world performance, the dd-example (with conv=fsync)
> > only got 88MB/s.
>
> On all my SSD disks, cryptsetup performance is not even near that. I
> have about 450 MB/s without encryption, and max. 120 MB/s with.
SSD performance has more 'it depends' than anything else.
It isn't funny. ;-)
But as i don't need my SSDs for write-heavy linear performance (much),
the much better random-write rate than HDDs still make them worthwile.
And the much better (random) read performance is the icing.
Overwriting appers to have better performance, but that is nothing i
would do regularly.
dd if=/dev/zero of=zero bs=1M count=10k oflag=direct
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 116.629 s, 92.1 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=zero bs=1M count=10k oflag=direct conv=notrunc
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 50.3905 s, 213 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=zero bs=1M count=10k oflag=direct conv=notrunc
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 51.0608 s, 210 MB/s
My previous SSD with a Sandforce controller had much worse "worst case"
performance as the Sandforce controller really doesn't like
incompressible data and encrypted data looks like (or at least should
look like) incompressible random-data.
--
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-17 21:36 [dm-crypt] unusual writing speeds when benchmark speeds are high enough .. ink ..
2013-03-17 22:55 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-03-18 6:42 ` .. ink ..
2013-03-18 8:37 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-03-18 10:01 ` Heinz Diehl
2013-03-18 10:20 ` Arno Wagner
2013-03-18 10:43 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer [this message]
2013-03-17 23:07 ` Arno Wagner
2013-03-17 23:19 ` .. ink ..
2013-03-18 6:22 ` Milan Broz
2013-03-18 7:58 ` .. ink ..
2013-03-18 18:16 ` .. ink ..
2013-03-18 7:06 ` Heinz Diehl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130318104359.GA8350@citd.de \
--to=ms@citd.de \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox