From: Arno Wagner <arno@wagner.name>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Pass+keyfile
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 04:31:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202033131.GA12320@tansi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1b3d98d969f8af03a8541b9a46a2e02@unseen.is>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:43:53 CET, 0x14@unseen.is wrote:
> >No bad logic so far, I overlooked that you use plain devices
> >and that you seem to be after some form of plausible deniablility,
> >not after increased security. Sorry.
>
> Some form of increased security with help of plausible deniability :-p
> I assumed it sounds and looks like another snake oil, so I came here
> for professional opinion :)
>
> >So if that is your goal, that would work. But be aware that
> >you always have to type the full (long) command in and that
> >you must make sure it does not end up on disk (shell history),
> >otherwise it becomes obvious the two things are not random.
>
> Actually, I was writing a bash script to simplify things a bit
> before I realize I need to clarify things here :) And I know about
> HISTIGNORE and stuff.
>
> What`s your opinion anyways? You do support some "plausible
> deniability" efforts with reservations, as I understood.
Actually the other way round. I think plausible deniability is
dangerous to the people using it in most situations. I am not
going to help with it.
Arno
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato
If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-02 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 14:54 [dm-crypt] Pass+keyfile 0x14
2014-12-01 16:39 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-01 16:49 ` Sven Eschenberg
2014-12-01 17:37 ` 0x14
2014-12-01 22:25 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-02 0:15 ` 0x14
2014-12-02 1:03 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-02 2:43 ` 0x14
2014-12-02 3:31 ` Arno Wagner [this message]
2014-12-02 3:51 ` 0x14
2014-12-02 19:16 ` 0x14
2014-12-02 21:02 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-02 22:48 ` 0x14
2014-12-02 23:22 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-02 23:40 ` 0x14
2014-12-03 16:15 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-03 16:19 ` Dragan Milivojević
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-01 2:54 0x14
2014-12-01 12:49 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-01 13:49 ` Quentin Lefebvre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141202033131.GA12320@tansi.org \
--to=arno@wagner.name \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox