From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from v1.tansi.org (mail.tansi.org [84.19.178.47]) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:30:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gatewagner.dyndns.org (81-6-44-245.init7.net [81.6.44.245]) by v1.tansi.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CBCD914013F for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:20:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:20:15 +0200 From: Arno Wagner Message-ID: <20200329102015.GA13364@tansi.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Why is the chk_luks_keyslots tool not routinely included? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de I think that is a decision by the distros. I am certainly willing to maintain it for the foreseeable future. It is not really much effort. Regards, Arno On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 22:56:25 CET, Robert Nichols wrote: > What is the rationale behind the chk_luks_keyslots tool not being included > by default in cryptsetup packages? It gets tiresome, and a bit > embarrassing, explaining to novices who are in trouble that they need to > build this tool from source. > > -- > Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. > Do NOT delete it. > > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@saout.de > https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier