From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:46:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DFE19CB.1010701@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:46:19 +0200 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DFDFFA5.70404@gmail.com> <4DFE0D59.1090000@redhat.com> <4DFE1507.6020909@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DFE1507.6020909@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Partition mandatory? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Patrick Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de On 06/19/2011 05:25 PM, Patrick wrote: > So, in the case of such a header destruction by an "old" OS, I think > it is still possible to restore the header I saved using > > _luksHeaderBackup_ --header-backup-file > > doing > > _luksHeaderRestore_ --header-backup-file > > Correct? yes, but it s just backup of LUKS header. Not a backup of data inside:-) (with old header backup and passphrase you can unlock the drive, so store it on safe place) Milan